User talk:Dce725/sandbox

Looks great! Huge expansion of the original article and well told. Just watch the hyperlinks to other pages - sometimes they come up multiple times within your article. Looking forward to see it published!

Nrchristman (talk) 03:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review: Great overview of a potentially huge topic. You did a good job incorporating scientific jargon with definitions. Are any of the images from lecture with the three pumps available in the Creative Commons? They might be useful for visual representation of carbon cycling in the pumps. Emazur94 (talk) 06:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review: Really thorough article about a complex topic! I thought it did a good job of keeping the language understandable for the average reader, and good use of visuals. The intro paragraph is a tad long, and could benefit from maybe being broken into two sections, just to prevent casual readers from disengaging. Excellent job overall though! Mosesm21 (talk) 21:28, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]