User talk:Dazaif

November 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 02:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dazaif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no relation to shadowdeaths whatsoever and I have not been reverting more than once every 24 hours -- please unblock me. Dazaif (talk) 08:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry to Banzaiblitz, which is the account listed in your block. Yamla (talk) 11:50, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dazaif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Banzaiblitz has not posted in over a year, and I have not reverted more than one edit in 24 hours -- like I said, I have no connection to shadowdeaths whatsover. My username was identified across platforms and hence I had to change accounts, but I have not evaded sanctions (as you can see from my edit history). Plus, as u/Belevalo has a history of edit-warring and has come close to or broken the revert rule many times on that page and was harassing other users, I deemed it to be vandalism and hence reverted his edits (whilst still being mindful of the 1 revert per 24 hours rule). Please unban me. Dazaif (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Banzaiblitz has posted in the last month. PhilKnight (talk) 20:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dazaif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, to clarify, Banzaiblitz has not posted in any wikipedia articles in the last month (only on another user's talk page). The rest of my comment still holds true -- given u/Belavalo's prior edit-warring history and his multiple violations of 3RR, I deemed it to be obvious violation and hence reverted his edits (whilst also still being mindful of my one revert per 24 hour rule). Dazaif (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dazaif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nobody has been addressing my points. My ban was LIFTED on 6 June 2020. I did not create this account to evade a ban as I haven't been under one, and have been following the rules imposed on my account (no revert per 24 hour, reverting obvious vandalism such as in this case a user previously engaged in edit-warring and broke the 3RR.) There was no intent to build a false consensus as Banzaiblitz has not posted in any wikipedia pages in over a year. Dazaif (talk) 03:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Nobody has been addressing my points" Because you don't have any. Three admins with Checkuser access weighed in on this one and they all came down against you. So strike four means you lose talk page access since you're wasting our time and yours. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #51434 declined. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 11:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]