User talk:DayTime99

DayTime99, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DayTime99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, DayTime99! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Jr8825 • Talk 16:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hello, I noticed that you added content to the lead of Nicholas II of Russia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. As it's part of the article lead, you don't necessarily have to include an inline citation (it largely depends on whether the lead is already using inline referencing, see MOS:LEADCITE for more), but if you opt not to include an inline citation you must make sure that you're summarising information that is already sourced in the article body (see also MOS:LEADREL). In this case the information you added wasn't included in the article body, so the best option is to add it to the body first, with a citation to a reliable source. You can also have a look at referencing for beginners if you'd like further guidance. Thank you. Jr8825 • Talk 16:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Money

Hi, DayTime99, while I'm sympathetic to your two reverts at John Money for good cause, including proper identification of OR and SYNTH on the part of another editor, it's best to talk it out at the Talk page after an initial re-revert, even if that temporarily leaves WP:THEWRONGVERSION present at the article. I've also reverted (my one and only revert; I won't revert again if undone by the other editor), and replied at the Talk page by way of explanation, which pretty much agrees with the rationale in your edit summaries at the article. Hopefully everyone can talk it out at the Talk page now, and this won't escalate further. Thanks again for your edits at the article. Mathglot (talk) 23:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]