User talk:DaxServer/sandbox

Heading 1

STATUS

Comment -- DaxServer (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Test

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hi

Hi — DaxServer (talk) 17:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § Proposal for new article title naming convention - RfC or local consensus — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at [[]]

You are invited to join the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § Proposal for new article title naming convention - RfC or local consensus]], which is within the scope of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy), which is within the scope of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Proposal for new article title naming convention - RfC or local consensus, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let's go one by one.

Reading thru Talk:Hyderabad#Dubious, I see multiple attempts to compel you to provide the quotation from p. 311, yet you have circumvented those requests stating this and that as a reason. At some point it is taken as an implied refusal to provide the quote as asked for.

Toddy1 reverting your edit 15:06, 3 August 2023 and asking for quotation to support your addition is completely within the bounds of WP:BRD. I don't see any problem with that. In the next edit 08:07, 4 August 2023 you've reverted Toddy1 and restored the citation you added originally. Here, I don't see any discussion on the talk page, nor in the edit summary atleast, as to why it is warranted without a generally accepted discussion of BRD. Then Toddy1 started a talk page discussion asking what the citation is for 08:46, 4 August 2023 and added a dubious tag 09:14, 4 August 2023. You then replied asking to read p. 311 10:53, 4 August 2023 and removed the dubious tag 11:19, 4 August 2023. DrKay added failed verification and dubious tags 13:57, 4 August 2023 along with a reply 13:57, 4 August 2023. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]