User talk:Dawood34

Peer Review

I really enjoyed the article it had some neat information on buzz population in relation to the worlds economy. I liked how you picked plants that are universally known such as the tomato. It does need some grammar check though to make it flow better. I would change “technology advancements” to technological advancements and at the end of the first paragraph you have, “at steady pace,” which I would change to at a steady pace. Also, I believe that lycopersicon esculentum should be italicized since it is a scientific name. Looks like some of your citations are missing links to them, not sure if this is a problem with Wikipedia being compatible with them or if you just haven’t added them yet. Overall, the article looks like it has made some really good progression and you did a good job at keeping a neutral tone. I would focus on making sure there is a good sense of flow in your writing, at some points it did seem choppy but this was only due to little grammatical errors.

Amperity moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Amperity, does not meet Wikipedia standards for inclusion. Specifically, there are issues woth References not being formatted correctly (use “cite” templates more), headings that should not be all caps, and many unneeded external links within the article. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 00:40, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Amperity concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Amperity, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amperity

Hello, Dawood34. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amperity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]