User talk:Daviesben24

June 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cheek to Cheek Tour has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cheek to Cheek Tour was changed by Daviesben24 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953276 on 2015-06-09T21:57:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ArtRave: The Artpop Ball, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fame Kills: Starring Kanye West and Lady Gaga. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to I Am JoJo Tour. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you introduce jokes into articles again, as you did at Fame Kills: Starring Kanye West and Lady Gaga, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:43, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of five days for repeated additions of unsourced content, as you did at Fame Kills: Starring Kanye West and Lady Gaga. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 17:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daviesben24, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daviesben24. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mike V • Talk 01:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Your repeated additions of unsourced content is shown to be deliberate vandalism by the fact that on several articles you have added different versions of false information, contradicting your own edits, to an extent which could not possibly have been accidental. In view of the nature of your vandalism, your persistence in doing it, and your use of sockpuppetry, I seriously considered blocking your account indefinitely, but decided to give you one more chance. However, any continuation of vandalism after the block is over may well lead to an indefinite block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.[reply]

March 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Formation World Tour, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 14:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daviesben24, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]