Jump to content

User talk:Davidnicholsknowsbest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Davidnicholsknowsbest, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Davidnicholsknowsbest! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Moodists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malcolm Ross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Davidnicholsknowsbest! You created a thread called Changing the title of an article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolla Meranda has been accepted

[edit]
Wolla Meranda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Last of England (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Turner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited So Young (Jo Jo Zep & The Falcons song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glenelg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaski (May 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kaski, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kaski (brandy) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kaski (brandy). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Moodists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graham Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tomorrow Belongs to Me (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Dean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stanley Argyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toorak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kaski (brandy)

[edit]

Hello, Davidnicholsknowsbest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kaski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 13:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clifford Holliday, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Reilly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swell Maps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Back to the Egg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JG66 (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Straight Outta Cullompton" connection to the Monkees' 1968 film "Head"

[edit]

I acknowledge your 19 March 2021 critique. I included the quote to show that there is another side that one should consider besides just the downbeat evaluations that everyone else made. Accordingly I would like to undo your cut of that section.98.149.97.245 (talk) 02:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Be my guest. I think my main concern was lack of context.

I just undid the cut, and, in front of the now-restored section, I added a sentence to explain to what the positive comment refers.98.149.97.245 (talk) 04:27, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great! thanks for keeping me in the loop, I appreciate it

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonia Borg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storm Boy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glass Creek

[edit]

Hi, thanks so much for your edits on the Glass Creek article, really appreciate the research. I'd been meaning to find out more about it but never got around to it. If you're the same David that I'm thinking of, I was one of your students and thoroughly enjoyed your classes (and excursions to interesting places). Takerlamar (talk) 01:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! For your thanks and also enjoying my classes and excursions. I'm glad you liked the Glass Creek stuff, I hope to find some more material to add in from the Public Records Office at some stage (deep dive into the MMBW files, I suspect). David Davidnicholsknowsbest (talk) 10:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Re Styles. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, I didn't give a page a different title - I am not sure what this means or how I would do it. I linked the name Re Styles in another page, then used the link to create a new page - as was suggested in another Wikipedia page. So, not sure what's been picked up here, but that isn't what happened. Davidnicholsknowsbest (talk) 08:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cora Lynn, Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaelic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]