User talk:Davidleejohn

Health care

Your are right to be cautious! If you don't mind being jumped on, try putting what you have found in the article. It sounds sufficiently researched to me.

Having said that, this article is, in general, for the average starting editor, NOT a good one to start on IMO! On a scale of 1-10, the feelings on this article run about (I am guessing) a 7 or so. A bit contentious. Your remark will keep. Do you mind working on a lower key article for awhile until you gain experience? Or not! Your choice! I would like to encourage you as an editor - the reason I would suggest another article first. Student7 (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)