User talk:Davide palladini
Welcome!
Hello, Davide palladini, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Davide palladini. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 21st century, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Surf's Up (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of animated feature films of the 1980s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aurora Productions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Davide palladini. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Davide palladini. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of animated feature films of the 2010s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaumont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Davide palladini,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 16:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Davide palladini,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Davide palladini,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing animated films of the 2000s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madhouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Highest grossing animated films by decades
[edit]I am in the middle of fixing some pages witch you recently created and would like some help Finnish of these pages are
- List of highest-grossing animated films of the 2000s
- List of highest-grossing animated films of the 2010s
- List of highest-grossing animated films of the 1980s
Here what need to be doing
- remove any and all live action animated film (see quote box)
An animated feature film is defined as a motion picture with a running time of more than 40 minutes, in which movement and characters' performances are created using a frame-by-frame technique. Motion capture by itself is not an animation technique. In addition, a significant number of the major characters must be animated, and animation must figure in no less than 75 per cent of the picture's running time.
—Rule Seven – Special Rules for the Animated Feature Film Award: I. Definition[1]
- limit each list to 50 (if not possible do it to the last 5)
- have the following list (highest Grossing film of the decade, computer, stop motion, Traditional
I will carry on make some more edits later on Fanoflionking 09:04, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
50. But why, Disney, Pixar and DreamWorks films couldn't be just their most liked films. There should be also different films that they should like, if they want.
50 was just a subject we should not list every animated film we got box office for with three additional list it should be quite open for other studios I.E Aardman to get a few films Fanoflionking 09:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing animated films of the 1980s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Warner Animation Group
[edit]Much of the info you added to Warner Animation Group is about Lego film rights; the films that Universal might make aren't relevant to WAG. Trivialist (talk) 20:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Can you please explain *why* all of that should remain, instead of just reverting me? Trivialist (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Regarding Template:Warner Animation Group: this is a navigation box and is intended to help navigation between articles, not a detailed list of info about the films. Please keep in mind that most users aren't as knowledgable or interested in details about films studios as you are. Trivialist (talk) 14:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
January 2020 - Template:Film Studio
[edit]Thanks for contributing to the article Template:Film Studio. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. In the case of this template, new major studios must be sourced at the Major film studio article. Spshu (talk) 21:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
[edit]Your recent editing history at Frozen II shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 10:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 10:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:A Bug's Life, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 12:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Blocked from editing
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Works
[edit]Thank you for your edits. However, it currently is not time for additional static forms. Wikipedia takes strength very seriously. The articles may be forged soon, or cut loose at a later date, unless we can determine the gateway and the perch of the words. If you know this information, then you can add a it to your userpage or your flowchart subpage, or to the contents talk page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the main Wikipedia talk page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please follow the exit correlation steps. TheThingy Talk 18:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of animated feature films of 2003, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Jones.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Nomination of List of highest-grossing animated films of the 1980s for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of highest-grossing animated films of the 1980s until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
TompaDompa (talk) 02:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]- ^ "88TH ACADEMY AWARDS OF MERIT" (PDF). Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-09.