User talk:DavideAndrea

Welcome!

Hello, DavideAndrea, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
How to edit a page and write a great article
The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
The handy Manual of Style
And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango 123 15:54, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. :)

Translation

Thank you, I appreciate it! Sarge Baldy 22:07, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chimonanthus

Hi Davide - Many thanks for the compliment! If you would like to translate it back into Italian, please do (I fear my knowledge of Italian is close to zero) - MPF 10:29, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cascata delle Marmore

Beautiful translation, thank you! Molte grazie! :D -Yupik 17:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PHEV

Looks like you've been talking to Felix. Thanks for inserting his edits. I spaced. Fbagatelleblack (talk) 03:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GrassrootsRadio.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:GrassrootsRadio.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KGNU logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:KGNU logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Electronics collaboration

Hi, I am writing to you because you have listed yourself as a member of the Electronics WikiProject. Sadly, this project is pretty dead, but I propose to resuscitate it with a collaboration. The idea is to have a concerted effort on improving one article per month, hopefully to GA or FA status and nominate the very best of them for the front page. I have prepared a page to control this process at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronics/Collaboration (actually, I mostly shamelessly stole it from Wikipedia:WikiProject Mammals where a collaboration of this sort was succesfully run). There you can make nominations for articles for collaboration or comment on the nominations of others.

If you want to take part you might like to place this template {{WikiProject Electronics Collaboration}} on your userpage which will give you a link to the current collaboration. If you are no longer interested in Wikiproject Electronics, please remove yourself from the members list, which is now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronics/Members

Thanks for listening, SpinningSpark 17:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sliding mode improvements

In February, you made comments on the sliding mode control article. Have the recent major changes addressed your concerns? If not, could you add to the talk page with some suggestions? Thanks! —TedPavlic | (talk) 18:33, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ted,

Thanks for your concerns. After re-reading the article introduction, I still feel the same way. It's missing a key phrase at the beginning, something like: "Sliding mode is a technique to (do something or other, to solve a particular problem) which is otherwise hard to do because (reason it's hard to do). It is used in (how it's used)...". Having said that, let me say that its perfectly OK for you to just dismiss me as an uninitiated person, and say that the article is intended for people who already have some understanding in the field.

Thanks,

D'de

Davide Andrea (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Davide — Thanks for your response (you can respond here if you like). Nonlinear control pages need to be made accessible to everyone --- regardless of whether or not they're initiated. It sounds like you would like a more general introduction to control or stability, yes? That is, do other nonlinear control pages (like the backstepping page) do a better job? Or are they all plagued by this problem? —TedPavlic | (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...do other nonlinear control pages (like the backstepping page) do a better job?

Indeed, yes: I found that introduction much more helpful to the uninitiated.

Thanks,

D'de

Davide Andrea (talk) 02:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Casing seems dubious

Whether commutors are in the casing or not doesn't seem to make a difference to what type of motor it is.

You could have two otherwise identical motors, but one with a slightly bigger casing, containing the electronics, and the other with the electronics external, and the table as you did it claims that they're completely different motors.

Indeed you are correct: they are completely different motors. Specifically, a BLDC with integral controller is a 2-wire, DC motor (you connect a battery to it, and it runs), while a controller-less BLDC (or an BLAC, which is nearly the same motor) is a 3-wire, AC motor: you need a motor driver that generates AC to drive it. So, yes, they are very different motors.

Here is an example of a DC BLDC (integral electronics): http://smartautomation.en.made-in-china.com/product/IoxESDMYZKcs/China-36mm-12-V-or-24-V-Brushless-DC-Motor-Bldc-Motor.html

And here is an example of a AC BLDC (no electronics): http://kellycontroller.com/hub-motor-48v3kw-high-torquedisc-brake-p-158.html

In the first case, all you need is the motor. In the second case, once you have the motor, now you have to go look for a motor driver.

Just like two motors, one with and one without a brushed commutator, are very different motors. Right?

The definition of an AC motor versus DC motor is solely regards the line voltage, and here one actually has an electronic commutator and the other hasn't. So they're rightly considered different motors, and they have different names, and they have different components and probably different behaviors as well. -Rememberway (talk) 01:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's right. They're the same, it's just a construction detail. I think that what we're mostly interested in is how the motors work, their topology. So we draw the system boundary so that even physically external electronics are still part of the motor. And so far as I know that's how the terms are used in the real world too. People talk about BLDC motors, but they usually have physically external electronics that produces the right signal to drive the coils, but it's still considered a DC motor, because that's the power supply you need to use it with.

I know, people are confused about this. But the fact they make that confusion doesn't make it factual. I mean, people say that the sun rises in the morning, even though that is not what happens, and saying that the Earth rotates is actually what is really happening.

So I think you're making an arbitrary distinction, ...

Well, yes. That is the nature of taxonomy. You try to make the most meaningful classifications you can, but, by its nature, taxonomy is an arbitrary process. In this case the process is based on industry standards.

... and that's also why there's blanks in your table. There shouldn't be blanks- IRL there's too many different sorts of motors for there to be blanks!

I am sorry, but that does not follow. The fact that there do not exist examples that fit a particular permutation does not indicate that the taxonomy is wrong.

If a table of animals has blank spaces for animals that are both bipedal and have a trunk, does it mean that the table is wrong? It just means that that particular combination does not exist.

Right. But bipedalism and having trunks is not orthogonal, whereas if you can classify things via orthogonal features, then you get a table that fills completely, and in this case this turns out to be possible. By doing that I was also able to find classes of real motors that weren't in the table. -Rememberway (talk) 01:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes? -Rememberway (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback; please let's continue this conversation. Davide Andrea (talk) 00:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you still prefer your way we could get Andy Dingley or someone to look at it, and go with whatever he thinks perhaps (although he doesn't seem to like me very much, so he may well pick your organisation anyway!). -Rememberway (talk) 01:15, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LogicalDOC translation

Hi Davide, i wish to ask you if you are available for translating the LogicalDOC article. Sprmw7 (talk) 09:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In Italian? Mnhhh, nah. It looks like a self-generated article, not for general interest. So, sorry, I'll decline.

Thanks for asking. Davide Andrea (talk) 18:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Short Discharge Time for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Short Discharge Time is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Short Discharge Time until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:39, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

translation

Hi, I was wondering if you might be willing to assist in a small translation job. Here is an illustration with Italian labels. Might you translate them into English? – JBarta (talk) 19:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baud or bit/s ?

Hi. I reverted your change to Serial port. The article section you linked in your edit summary actually states that bit/s is the correct unit of measurement:

"The term baud has sometimes incorrectly been used to mean bit rate" (emph. added)

Also, as it says in the external link to EDN magazine:

"Serial-data speed is usually stated in terms of bit rate. However, another oft-quoted measure of speed is baud rate. Though the two aren’t the same, similarities exist under some circumstances. This tutorial will make the difference clear."

What you set on a serial port is the bit rate, and this is measured in bit/s, not "baud". If you connect the serial port to a modem, then the comms on the analog line might have a different baud than the bit rate, if several bits are sent with one symbol change—which is common on modern modems. Incidentally, despite its use in the EDN article, "baud rate" is itself grammatically incorrect, as "baud" is already a "rate" (1 baud = 1 symbol change per second). Jeh (talk) 16:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. you might also take a look at the comparisons between bit rates and baud of some modem standards here. Jeh (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DAVID BMS

	ELECTRIC
	BMS Dj71 (talk) 19:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DavideAndrea. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alternative Radio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternative Radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative Radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquis de Faux (talk) 02:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DavideAndrea. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DavideAndrea. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DavideAndrea. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of Villa Annoni

Hi, are you available to translate this article https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Villa_Annoni from Italian into English? There are a lot of American tourists coming to Cuggiono to see the Villa and I think it would be helpful to have an article in their mother tongue. --DelicateAloe (talk) 16:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inrush current limiter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inrush current limiter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inrush current limiter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 15:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inrush current limiter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inrush current limiter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inrush current limiter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for translation check

Hi DavideAndrea, I ask you a favor. I wrote the voice of an Italian artist "Andrea Benetti" and a Wikipedian expert, helped me create and improve the voice. Now he suggested that I contact an experienced Wikipedian (Italian-English) to help in checking the translation from Italian to English. If you can take a look to see if everything is fine, the link of the voice is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Benetti_(artist). Hoping you can help me, thank you for what you will do, --BarbaraLuciano13 (talk) 08:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Want to add more value to existing article

I'm really sorry that I was added link directly without proper formatting. But, based on my knowledge the page is more relavant and helpful to the users. So, I request you to check it again and help me to add that article in external links. Please note, here my intention is not to add links into wiki. I want to share the best knowledge. Aditya3181 (talk) 13:04, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode chart translation request

Hello. I maintain multilingual Wikimedia charts showing roadmaps to the various planes of the Unicode Standard.
I'm hoping you will provide Italian translations for me. (I noticed your user name on the Wikipedia:Translators available list.)
The specifics are at User:Drmccreedy/roadmap_multilingual.
After the charts have been updated they can be added to this Italian Unicode article.
Thank you for any help you can offer. DRMcCreedy (talk) 01:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]