User talk:Davidbilla2007

Welcome!

Hello, Davidbilla2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 04:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fake Semi-protection

Please don't attempt to fake page protection as you did to Asal.
Amalthea 11:33, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Super Star listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ultimate Super Star. Since you had some involvement with the Ultimate Super Star redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Amalthea 11:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asal

Can you come to the talk page Talk:Asal (film)‎ and discuss the external links? There's been a section on them for several days now, please explain why you find that they comply with our policy on external links. Persistently changing them without discussion is not constructive.
Thank you, Amalthea 08:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have chosen not to explain at this time, I've removed the links again. Please don't add them back, but discuss on the talk page first and wait for a consensus to form.
Amalthea 10:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also with Asal, stop adding non encyclopedic information to it. For example, you keep adding a section called "Shahrukh plays cameo." That news is not official and was just a rumour and therefore does not need to be in the article. Also, no offense but you need to learn a little English. The section titled RECEPTION does NOT refer to the meaning of a function (such as marriage reception), the meaning of the term "reception" in films is what the audience's response to the film was. So stop adding the film's pooja launch ceremony info under that heading. If you want, you can add that to the Development section. Please take care when editing articles. Eelam StyleZ (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Asal 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Asal 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Amalthea 13:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has Reserved Some rights. Please Check this. Check the source. Davidbilla2007 (talk) 11:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, whitewashing images by uploading them to flickr is not enough. 1) Where's the blog of that person who allegedly owns the image? 2) Where is the proof that he owns it? 3) Where is the proof that he has released them under a compatible free license? Amalthea 13:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Br4011 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Amalthea 13:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add that I find this very sad. I had hoped you would have learned your lesson and would try to abide by Wikipedia's rules now. Instead you went back to all the old issues: copyright violations and abusive socking.
Let me make this clear, you are one step away from a ban. If you continue to evade your block, that's going to be it. Once your are banned from Wikipedia and continue to evade it, all your edits will be reverted on sight, regardless of merit. Thus far, I have accepted a certain amount of block evasion from you when you edited by IP to make minor tweaks. That's not going to happen again. If you ever want your editing priviledges restored in the future, I expect you to follow the rules by the letter. If not, then that's it. Amalthea 13:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Davidbilla2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I cant to any edits. I'am very sorry for that upload. This is a net cafe in this only i'am doing work. . i dont have Own PC. You as mis understand me. Please unblock me. hereafter This like mistakes Will not come. I'll follow the wikipedia rules. Davidbilla2007 (talk) 11:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Failure to address reason for block (sockpuppetry). — Daniel Case (talk) 13:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Paramasivan.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paramasivan.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]