User talk:David Pierce

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 06:49, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Selam

Selam , Türk karşıtı kullanıcı Khoikhoi ingilizce wikipedia'da adminlik için şansını deniyor.Daha fazla türk gelirse bunu engelleyebiliriz. Oyunu burdan kullanabilirsin Teşekkürler. (85.97.143.5 18:16, 26 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Language

Just posting to Talk:Language is fine. When making large (and especially controversial) changes to an article, it's best to discuss first and edit later; the trouble with being bold is that other people are bold back. Consensus first tends to be more productive. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:36, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, David. Sorry, I meant to poke around at Talk:Language, but I do subscribe to the be-bold philosophy, and I ran out of time and steam after the changes I made. Anyway, I have now remedied the situation, and have started a discussion of my changes and ideas for improving the page. As I said there, I think this can be an important backbone article. I look forward to ironing out just how to make it so with you and others. --Tox 13:45, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil Grammar and an Incompleteness Theorem

Unfortunately, I have no qualifications whatsoever to write about language. But in my opinion, the opening section of the article 'Language' should simply be removed, or at the very least moved to the end. However, doing so myself would gain nothing, since I don't have the tools to defend my position. If you've been rebuffed trying to do this before, I suspect it has something to do with Tamil chauvinism. Such are the limitations of the Wikipedia, which can be wunderbar or schlecht, or both in one and the same article! I propose the following THEOREM: The Wikipedia is consistent iff it is complete. Since it cannot be complete... RCSB 21:17, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Essays on Metaphysics

Mr. Pierce:

Your user page indicates that you were attempting to create a subpage within your userspace in which to house Essays on Metaphysics. However, you inadvertently created the page within the main article space. That is, instead of creating User:David Pierce/Metaphysics, you created David Pierce/Metaphysics.

Your comments on your userpage make it clear that this was an innocent mistake, so I have taken the liberty of moving the page so that it resides in the correct location. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them on my talk page. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 21:35, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Metaphysics

I am not sure how, but User:Matia.gr asked if I could take a look at that article you're writing. (Perhaps s/he knew that I have spent quite a bit of time clearing out copyright problems on Wikipedia:Copyright problems. I'm not a lawyer, but I've learnt a little while I've been on Wikipedia, and I've left my thoughts on the matter at User talk:David Pierce/Metaphysics. I hope you don't feel I'm interfering. -Splash^talk 21:29, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Language vs a language

David, would you be so kind as to share your opinion concerning my question placed on the talk:language page? jVirus 08:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Care to discuss my question here? What is the difference between language and a language, linguistically that is? jVirus 23:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

It is still not clear whether you are responding to my comments under Talk:Language/Archive_1#recent_changes, where I suggested that a language is to language as a human is to humanity.

David Pierce 08:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Callas

Hi David, if you take a look at the talk page for that article you'll see I was, several months ago, an aggressive champion for removing POV from it, which at the time was extensive. However, the wording of the intro changed by you is, I believe, completely supported by the article. Please feel free to comment on the article's talk page. All the best, Robert K S 14:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Cytorus

Hello David, sure a hatnote would be fine. Cheers! Ruigeroeland (talk) 08:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pappus's hexagon theorem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pappus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, David Pierce. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, David Pierce. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]