User talk:David Jeffery

Hello, I'm wondering where you got the map info for the Merseyside County Council elections. I've created pages for all the Wirral local elections and have only been able to find the boundaries from 1983 onward. User:Brianbbrian

@Brianbbrian: I got them from a map at Liverpool Central Library, which I scanned, and then traced the boundary lines in GIMP and then converted it to a shapefile in QGIS. I'm happy to send them to you if you want. David Jeffery (talk) 11:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool independent councillors

I just reverted your change because apart from a news article confirming a split I can see no reference to any party / group name. The name you give refers to a group in New South Wales. --10mmsocket (talk) 08:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - they've announced it on their twitter - should have linked to it: https://twitter.com/supendedlab/status/1516531717095538705 David Jeffery (talk) 08:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, David Jeffery. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Liverpool City Region Combined Authority, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Pushing your own academic work in articles is a clear conflict of interest. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What an absolute joke - so as one of the very few academics doing peer-reviewed research on this specific institution I can't link to published, peer-reviewed work, which I don't financially benefit from? How petty. David Jeffery (talk) 12:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking back at your history you have pushed your academic work quite a bit. If the published, peer-reivewed work is relevant to the article / adds value, then I'm sure others will add it. Why not suggest it for consideration on the article's talk page? 10mmsocket (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of the word 'pushing' is pretty loaded, considering that I don't get any financial benefit from this. I only mention my work on Wikipedia because it's relevant and it's on topics I'm passionate about. I will suggest it on the article's talk page but that seems like an unnecessary barrier to sharing knowledge. David Jeffery (talk) 12:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]