User talk:DavidWayneJohnson

Welcome!

Hello, DavidWayneJohnson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

The Number of the Beast

I have reverted your addition of material at 666. There is already a brief discussion of the biblical significance of the number in the article, with a larger discussion at Number of the beast. Your addition of unsourced material does not improve the article. If you would like to expand on Number of the beast, please do so, but only citing valid sources. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to 666 (number), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 20:26, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, DavidWayneJohnson. You have new messages at WikiDan61's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Omega

You really aren't understanding the concept of WP:original research. You simply may not add a swath of interpretation of Bible texts without providing a source other than the Bible. Sourcing your interpretation directly to the Bible means that you are providing your own interpretation of the Bible, and this is simply not allowed at Wikipedia. Since you have been warned of this previously, and since you continue to add your own interpretations, I have marked this latest edit as vandalism. If you continue down this path, you will likely find yourself blocked. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:27, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at 666 (number), you may be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 21:28, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 666 (number), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - DVdm (talk) 21:43, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:33, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DavidWayneJohnson, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi DavidWayneJohnson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yuss yuss!

Fucking good luck to you, sweetcheeks!!! LOL... All the best Basket _Feudalist 17:50, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]