User talk:DavidLenehan

Hello David,

You appear to be new to Wikipedia, so I'll gently point out the errors of your ways.

Firstly, you have done a couple of things on the article Neve which are considered highly antisocial: Removing alterative definitions and transwiki links in your first edit, and removing the advert and cleanup templates. Note that repeated reversions will lead to your being blocked. The article has been identified as needing work, and if you wish to contest that you need to follow the procedures outlined in the templates.

However, it is very clear that the article as it currently stands does violate the cornerstone principles of Wikipedia - Neutral Point of View and WP:Verifiability. I'm not an admin, so I don't have a load of help links at my fingertips, but I suggest that you read a range of the Wikipedia policy and support articles.

Also, when adding wikilinks, you need to link appropriately - always visit the link when you are at the preview stage. For example, you linked 1073, which goes to an article on the year 1073 AD, or producers which redirected to producer which goes to a disambiguation page linking to lots of articles, one of which was Record producer - probably the article you intended.

You appear to have been personally involved with Neve. It is recommended that individuals do not contribute to articles on themselves nor people with a direct interest in companies or organisations edit articles about the said companies, because it is virtually impossible to maintain an unbiased viewpoint. (There is of course a exception of correcting errors of fact).

The key thing is not to think that anyone is "ganging up" on you. We are all here to help, and the tagging with cleanup and advert templates will bring the article to the attention of experienced editors who want to help you create a good article. dramatic 06:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Neve Logo web blackfontRGB.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Neve Logo web blackfontRGB.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)