User talk:DavidDublin

Welcome!

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! If you need help or just want to say hello, click here and leave a message! [1] -- Phgao 12:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ian_Maher.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ian_Maher.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous Link

Hi, the page Irish is a disambiguation page - as the word could mean the people, the language, the country and other things. It's generally better to use a link directly to the topic that you mean. So in the case of your edits to Ger O’Brien and Robbie Clarke (and probably others?) you could use [[Irish people|Irish]] or [[Ireland|Irish]]. Keep up the good work! Gil Gamesh 11:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Joey Somerville has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Icseaturtles★ 10:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eoghan Carew

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Eoghan Carew, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:ATHLETE as he has never played in a fully-pro league.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Giant Snowman 19:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Eoghan Carew

I have nominated Eoghan Carew, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eoghan Carew. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Giant Snowman 12:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Irish Football

Time to get this kick started again.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

AfD is not a vote-counting process - it's about weighing up the strength of the arguments and deciding which one is better. As it appears to be fairly clear that the Finnish league is not fully professional, those players all failed WP:ATHLETE. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the individual players might be professional is irrelavnt - this is why we do not have articles on players at professional clubs from the Football Conference, i.e. because the whole league is not professional (as required by WP:ATHLETE). пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because it gave me hope that other admins put arguments based on policy and guidelines above those with no basis other than their own opnions or desire to annoy other editors. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 17:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen McCrossan

The article Stephen McCrossan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 17:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barry Clancy

The article Barry Clancy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Plays in the second tier of League of Ireland football - not a fully professional league, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 10:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alan Byrne (footballer born 1983)

The article Alan Byrne (footballer born 1983) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 00:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WikiProject Football/Alan Byrne (footballer born 1983) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WikiProject Football/Alan Byrne (footballer born 1983) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Shiels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 14:54, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Neil Lennon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:10, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Scully (footballer)

The article David Scully (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Appearances in european competition was firstly in qualifying rounds not competition proper and secondly was in matches between two teams neither of whom play in a fully professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 10:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
By rights I should block you outright for edit warring given that thre separate editors have told you to stop adding / removing content from WP:FPL, particularly given that there is an open thread on the talk page. However, given that you have no real warnings on your talk page at the moment and are actively involved in the discussion thread I won't. However, please take this as your only warning. WP:FPL is a list that governs a WP guideline. No changes should be made to it without proper consensus being achieved. If you make any further edits to the list without prior consensus indicating they are appropriate you will be blocked. If you disagree with other editors and feel the talk page discussion is not helpful, there are other option available. Fenix down (talk) 07:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DavidDublin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Donnelly (football manager)

The article Thomas Donnelly (football manager) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't come close to meeting WP:BIO and has not played or managed in a fully professional league

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 94.9.123.24 (talk) 21:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ian Malone (footballer)

The article Ian Malone (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as per this and this. The only source that I could find was this in terms of WP:GNG and it's well short of the mark.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 10:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]