User talk:David100b

The Flamingos

Sorry I got that wrong. Two Flamingos groups! I suppose the person who put the Doo Wop at (sic) 50 in the article earlier made the same mistake. Thanks for straightening that out. Donner60 (talk) 00:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 31#OTRS pending since 10-19 May. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC) This picture is used with authorization from Terry Johnson, copyright holder.[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of the files that you have uploaded may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 February 26#OTRS pending since November. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Scott (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Scott and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 07:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! David100b, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 07:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Scott (singer) (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Mark Scott (singer) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Scott (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~KvnG 16:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"When the name of a band requires the definite article, lowercase it in running text"

Chicago Manual of Style: [1] (click on Answer). So please stop changing it, as you did at List of Miracles group members, The Flamingos, etc. Rothorpe (talk) 14:22, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Drifters

Concerning the recent Drifters edit: "The US Trademark Appeal Court has recently ruled that this is not the official Drifters group and is taking action to decline their mark." In that case, please add this info to the article (with proof). (Also, change is to was in the first paragraph, and put the year the group cease to exit in the Infobox; since it has no present members.)--Halls4521 (talk) 21:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mark Scott (singer) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mark Scott (singer), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Scott (singer)

Hello, David100b. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Mark Scott".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Mark Scott (singer)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Solid Gold Weekend (radio program)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Solid Gold Weekend (radio program) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 04:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Solid Gold Weekend (radio program), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 09:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Solid Gold Weekend (radio program)

The article Solid Gold Weekend (radio program) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adam9007 (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to keep the page active and disagree that it's non-notable. The show airs on 9 radio stations across the United States and there are many Wikipedia pages discussing DJs and other radio programs. David100b (talk) 16:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solid Gold Weekend (radio program) for deletion

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solid Gold Weekend (radio program) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solid Gold Weekend (radio program) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Platters

As I'm sure you must know after almost ten years of editing, statements in edit summaries like "I'm well versed on The Platters history" count for absolutely nothing here. We go by what reliable, published sources say. I'm quite happy to compare sources on the article talk page, and indeed have already raised the issue - you have not responded. That is where discussion takes place - not in edit summaries, not on pages like this, and certainly not through reverting good faith edits to maintain the status quo ante, which you have done several times. If you persist in your behaviour one more time you will immediately be reported for edit warring. Just discuss the matter in a civil fashion in the proper place, and that can be avoided. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:53, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More than happy to discuss it. The subject in discussion was a member of the earlier group named The Flamingos. He played piano with The Platters on their first recording session but is not considered an original member. There are more published sources than not that don't consider him an early member of the group. I'm making changes for accuracy.

Please discuss it on the article talk page. On Wikipedia, verifiability is paramount - not what you believe to be true. " Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. If reliable sources disagree, then maintain a neutral point of view and present what the various sources say, giving each side its due weight." Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Miracles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Flamingos - 1957.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Flamingos - 1957.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]