User talk:Davewho2
Welcome!
Hello, Davewho2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! TMS63112 14:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Disambiguation page linking
[edit]Hi, thanks for your contribution to the Detroit Rock City (disambiguation) page. Note, however, that disambiguation pages are formatted a bit differently to normal articles: in particular, each line should only link its disambiguation target. For more information, see Wikipedia:Disambiguation. —Piet Delport 02:11, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Placeholder images
[edit]You were involved in the discussion of the "no free image" placeholders. Can you comment here? — Omegatron 08:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. I'm not sure why you thought "the cast listing looked a little odd," since hundreds of cast listings look exactly like it, but in any event, your change wasn't necessary. There was a discussion about this format awhile ago and the consensus was that "Mary Smith as Jane Jones" generally is used when a description of the character follows, i.e., "Mary Smith as Jane Jones, a drug-addicted prostitute living in a lower East Side tenement." Also, the use of boldface type is not at all common in a cast list. I reverted the change you made. Thanks again for writing. MovieMadness (talk) 13:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Fats Waller Vandalism
[edit]I realize you didn't add the bit about Fats being born in Passaic, NJ, but you added brackets to it. Please don't edit an article unless you are aware of the facts therein. Fats was born in Harlem and the bit about him being born in Passaic, NJ is vandalism from people who watched the Be Kind, Rewind picture. Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia. 24.175.66.89 (talk) 13:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- I moved your comment to me to my real talk page, I had written the above without logging in (oops). As far as your comments about editing pages without checking the history, I can see your point that when you're copyediting you can't sit there and slog through the history to make sure you're not copyediting vandalism. Copyediting is badly needed here and not many people like to do it, so forget I opened my big mouth. ;-)
- On welcoming you to Wiki, I certainly wasn't meaning to be unkind or presuming you were some newbie. I added the welcome because you had nothing on your talk page and I just thought it would be friendly to do so. Supertheman (talk) 16:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback may be removed at any time.
If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety talk 01:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for reverting that vandalism to the Phillies article. I reported the IP to WP:AIV. I appreciate your contributions! KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 02:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for patrolling
[edit]Thanks for patrolling the Wikipedia waters with me tonight. I just wanted to offer any help if you need it in the future. Thank you! --mboverload@ 04:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Also, how did you do that 5 diff thing in AIV. Is that automated with a tool somewhere? --mboverload@ 04:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Something weird with your (huggle) revert?
[edit]I think something weird happened with your revert at Tony Snow: as best as I can understand, you reverted more than a hundred edits (113, to be precise), while your summary says you reverted five edits by two users (edits that were apparently legitimate, at that). Anyways, I reverted it, and I don't know much about how Huggle works, but I just thought you might want to check on that. ~Wikimancer X *\( ' ' ^) 07:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ed Jarvis
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ed Jarvis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Unreferenced since October 2007. Add references or article will be deleted.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Unionsoap (talk) 11:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Im opening this post about the reverse u made in my edit on Julia Alexandratou. Id like the warning removed because the information is verifiable and I re did it with sources. Thanks in advance Ignorance is bliss (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey man
[edit]I'm just trying to spam links to YouTube videos, what are you going and using super-advanced anti-vandalism tools for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.234.248 (talk) 00:11, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
What's your problem?
[edit]I've already explained my edit in the edit summary; considering the mere seconds that elapsed between my posting the edit and your reverting it, it is obvious you didn't even read it, yet you classified it as vandalism based on the heuristics of some dumb bot. Tell you what, if you're there just to press the Revert button upon mere suggestion of a computer program, an upgrade to the program and a lobotomy on your brain would yield more efficient results. Clearly the lobotomy part is already taken care of (or you were simply born that way); now is just a matter of having the bot do the reversions all by itself. It's not all that difficult, other bots already do that.
Tell you what, i'm reverting to self, and unless you want trouble, you're not going to revert me, at least not with a vandalism claim. K? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.132.65.15 (talk) 00:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: Inadvertent block?
[edit]Whoops. Did I screw up? Hold on, let me go back and take a look here. Get back to you in a sec. - Vianello (Talk) 19:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, now I see what you mean. No, the reason for this particular temporary block was WP:3RR violation - repeatedly, actually. It was a block for edit-warring, not vandalism. Said activity is chronicled quite clearly at [1]. While the post was on AIV, the reason for the block was separate. - Vianello (Talk) 19:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, there ya go. 3RR is a bright-line rule. While it's true this specific rule was not brought to the user's attention, and probably should've been, this went well beyond just a simple "toe over the line" type violation in my opinion. - Vianello (Talk) 19:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Not a problem at all! I appreciate you keeping a lookout. Accidents and mistakes happen, you know how it is. Better to have 'em caught than not. - Vianello (Talk) 19:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, there ya go. 3RR is a bright-line rule. While it's true this specific rule was not brought to the user's attention, and probably should've been, this went well beyond just a simple "toe over the line" type violation in my opinion. - Vianello (Talk) 19:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Twitter-030709.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Twitter-030709.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:31, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Savvis-2009.PNG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Savvis-2009.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)