User talk:Daveleicuk

Welcome!

Hello, Daveleicuk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

I see that you have added an image tag to Swithland but the image doesn't seem to exist. Let me know if you're having any trouble uploading the image. --Michig (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Michig,Please bear with me,I'm not very computer literate.I've uploaded some photos to Wikimedia Commons.I wanted to add one of these to the article on Swithland,but seem to be going round in circles.All photos are my work.Daveleicuk (talk) 18:05, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the new image. You can see what I did here. Let me know if you have any further questions or problems. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 18:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daveleicuk, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Daveleicuk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good job!

I see that you just introduced yourself on the Teahouse guest page. Congrats. First step in becoming a great Wikipedian. If you need any help I recommend you to be adopted. Or you can ask an expierienced user such as- User:Buster7, User:Cindamuse, User:Ryan Vesey, User:SarahStierch. You can mainly ask Sarah for permission on creating something. I wish I could help, but I'm sort of not allowed to. So, I hope you enjoy Wikipedia and become great here. Feel free to leave me a message as well. RaidenRules! (talk) 18:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some links to help you out a little.

Hello Daveleicuk. Welcome to the English Wikipedia
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and/or guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talkpage of the article. Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This doesn't have to be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask an expierienced Wikipedian who is willing to help, for assistance.
	Policies, guidelines and peer assistance	Help and Tutorials
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Tutorial. Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	How to start a page. If you want to create a new article
	Style Guide. The complete guide to how articles should look.	Help. The complete help guide
	Copyright. Addressing copyright concerns.	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Your user pages and your sandbox. Editing in your own "personal" space
	Adoption program. Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four ~~~~ or by pressing or in the editing interface tool box, located just above the editing window (when editing). Do not sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted, but only when using the article talkpage, yours or another editor's talkpage. Another valuable page that may provide information and assistance is User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. If you have any questions about how to do small things *NOT EDITING* than feel free to ask me! Example: talkback messages, rules of talking to other editors, etc. Visit my talk page if you need anything. RaidenRules! (talk) 19:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Swithland Slate suggestion

Hi Dave, thanks for doing some editing about Swithand Slate. It is good to see you having a go, and starting by doing small edits (much the best way to start getting the hang of things). I will just make a couple of suggestions at this stage, one really easy, and one that takes us all ages to get used to. The easy one first - make sure that all your punctuation has a space after it, to keep everything nicely spaced. It would be good practice to go back over the edits you have done to check these out. You can also use the 'Show Preview' button, to have a look at the thing before it has been saved for public view.

The second is the issue of citations. Wikipedia is about assembling what is known from reliable sources. So any new information added to a page should be backed up by a citation, saying where the information has been written about. Lots of pages have ended up with lots of un-sourced information, and you will come across warnings on some of pages. To avoid this happening to your edits, you will want to get into the habit of adding references, which might be to either a printed book or a reliable website. By putting this between <ref> ... </ref> commands in the text, it will get added to the footnotes at the bottom of the page. A good place to learn more is at Help:Citations quick reference, which also has useful links to further explanations. In short, when editing for wikipedia it is not enough to know a thing is true, you need to be prepared to find out who has convincingly published that it is true. That way both other editors and more importantly, interested readers can both test its reliability, and take their interest further.

Thanks again for having a go at editing. It is well worth sticking with, and feel free to leave any questions on my talk page. RobinLeicester (talk) 21:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Newarke (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject of this article is not notable. You may consider adding more reliable third-party sources and references to support your claims and demonstrate notability of this topic, but in the end you'll have to show and explain how this is notable in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Newarke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 20:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm The Optimistic Guy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Draft:The Newarke— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — T O G 15:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of St. Quentin Canal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Rawlinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of St. Quentin Canal

G'day Dave, just wanted to say thank you for your efforts with the Battle of St. Quentin Canal. Nice work! Overall, it is looking quite good. I have one suggestion for further development: have you thought about potentially adding an Aftermath section, to explain the subsequent events and provide any analysis? Anyway, once again, thanks for your work. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AR, not sure if I'm replying in the right place here. Thanks for your message. I've expanded the article a bit. Not quite sure which subsequent events or what analysis you mean. It may be a task best left to others, but I might give it a go if you could make some suggestions. I have come to have a particular interest in the battle because two of my distant relatives were killed in it and because my local regiment formed part of 46th Division.

One of my relatives was a tank gunner killed in the attack to which I refer where 4 heavy and 5 medium tanks were destroyed. He was in 8th Battalion in 5th Tank Brigade supporting 15th Infantry Brigade A.I.F. and the freely available stuff from the A.W.M. has been really useful. Cheers, Daveleicuk. 1 May 2017 Daveleicuk (talk) 13:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, yes here is the right place to reply. Regarding subsequent events and analysis I would suggest a discussion of any follow up attacks, or if the line was advanced in the sector any further before the end of the war. Also, I'd suggest mentioning casualties etc. An example of what I mean can be found here: Winter operations 1914–1915. Anyway, thanks for your efforts. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Online ref

Thanks for your work on Battle of St. Quentin Canal. After responding t your question, I now intend to actually read it!

At the help desk, you asked:

In this article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_St._Quentin_Canal#References

the first listed item, the American Battle Monuments Commission book, is available as a downloadable pdf or for viewing online. Chapter VI is the relevant one for my ref and I'd like to add it. I'd appreciate help with this Daveleicuk (talk) 16:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found a much later edition (1992) here:

http://www.history.army.mil/html/books/023/23-24/

Do you believe we should replace the existing referenced (1938) edition with this one, or do you have a link to the old edition? -Arch dude (talk) 02:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to use the newer edition, I recommend that you check the page numbers in your refs. I also did not actually answer your question. So: you used the cite book template. this template has a "url" parameter. so to make the link just add the parameter, like this:

American Battle Monuments Commission (1992). American Armies and Battlefields in Europe. Washington,D.C. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

And now off I go to read the article. -Arch dude (talk) 04:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Thank you Arch dude.[reply]

I will check the 1992 edition. The reason I quoted the 1938 ed was that this seems to be the one to which the current website links when I look at the ABMC info on the Somme American Cemetery or the Bellicourt Memorial. Thanks for the tip on adding the url too. (I still have some more to add to the article too). Daveleicuk (talk) 07:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arch dude,

I seem to be unable to connect to the ABMC website via your link, but the 1938 edition will be fine and I'll just add the web link. Daveleicuk (talk) 15:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More here, just in case it wasn't already covered.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arch dude,

I managed to accessthe ABMC 1992 edition and it is a facsimile of the original, but thanks anyway,

Dave Daveleicuk (talk) 06:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Daveleicuk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Daveleicuk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Daveleicuk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]