User talk:Davec01

Welcome

Hello, Davec01, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 06:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

March 2017

Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ukraine without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NeilN ^{talk to me} 07:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flood myth

It would seem obvious that an article titled Flood myth should use the term in the article. If you want to change it, you need to raise a move request. Doug Weller talk 05:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete part of a quote and sources

As you did here. Doug Weller talk 05:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Darius the Mede, you may be blocked from editing. Given your other edits, your removal of sourced text in this article also appears to be a violation of WP:NPOV. Doug Weller talk 18:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 11:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Davec01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Some people on your site use outdated sources or sources that are no longer accessible to advocate for a biased liberal or atheist view on subject matter pertaining to certain religions and historical records all for the attempt at promoting secular views on the internet. You play the internet hall monitor game when it comes to me removing historical inaccuracies or opinions of biased individuals not based upon facts. You say that I'm not here to contribute to building an encyclopedia yet removing inaccuracies and bias opinions is part of building an encyclopedia or any text centered upon educating the general public. Your stupidity on that has only helped to validate your liberal approach. You're not running this site to teach the public the truth, but rather indoctrinate the public to conform to your belief and because of that I am no longer contributing financially to wikpedia. And if you don't understand what I'm saying let me offer a more simplistic explanation; Go F*** yourself.

Decline reason:

I was going to give you the opportunity to learn and consider unblocking you in good faith, but your edit here clearly tells me that you have no intention of taking advantage of this, so I'm not going to waste my time. Your request to be unblocked is declined. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Davec01 - I think there might be an issue with your possible intent vs what was perceived with the edits you've been making. I understand that you're removing what is believed to be inaccurate, but you left no edit summary explaining this and you didn't start a discussion on the article's talk page first; you instead have been removing a high amount of content from some articles, and didn't respond nor ask for help when other editors reverted your changes and left you messages and warnings on your talk page. May I ask why you did not do so? I'm willing to accept this as a learning opportunity and consider unblocking you, but you have to agree on some things first and I want to include Doug Weller on this appeal, because I'd like his input and his approval as well. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually... never mind. I saw your edit here and I'm no longer considering an unblock. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock reviewed|reason=@oshkosh b'gosh, I hope you understood the simplicity of my edit because in case i didn't spell it out enough, FUCK YOU. You atheist trolls keep spreading lies and trying to indoctrinate the public to conform to your beliefs is unethical, and immoral. When your site collapses, which it will because your a cancer to society I will feel no remorse for you.