User talk:Daveb74

Welcome!

Hello, Daveb74, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ForestH2

Thanks

I am just starting to explore editing Wikipedia, I have been using it for ages and am quite interested in Social software Daveb74 23:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to post any comments on my talk page if you need help! ForestH2

Daveb74, post to the discussion page. Not my user page. The discussion page is up there next to the link. See it? I'm logging off so I can't answer your question right now, but I'll answer it when I return in about 5'1/2 hours. --ForestH2

Which user did this? Or IP? I'll look into it and speak to the user. You can to. Who was it? Look at the history up near dicuss, edit this page etc. and which ever person changed the link let me know. --ForestH2

Pepso, did it for no good reason as far as I can see. Sorry it took so long to get back to you. ForestH2

In reply to your question regarding Dramapod

I have nominated Dramapod for deletion. Whether or not it will be deleted depends on the result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dramapod, where you are also welcome to participate. The reason why I listed it for deletion is because Dramapod and dramapod.com do not meet the Wikipedias notability guidelines. See Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (web)). --Ezeu 22:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Respond to your question

Sorry Daveb for the long wait! I'm not sure what your asking-if I think the article should be deleted? ForestH2

Media sources

You should check out Wikipedia:Reliable sources for guidelines on how to evaluate sources used for Wikipedia articles. And in response to your question, Wired Magazine is an entirely appropriate source (though for any article you'll need at least a few independent sources). Fagstein 17:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]