User talk:DaveWF

Welcome!

Hello, DaveWF, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ryan 08:20, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Deborah Jeane Palfrey

Frankly, someone's own words about something they plan to do in the future are not reliable. Too many other things can come into play. And Alex Jones is levels below Limbaugh or O'Reilly on the reputation and reliable sources barometer. Regardless, this is a talk page issue for the article. Make your case there as to why it is important to include this information. And please don't intersperse your new thoughts into 9 month old sections on the talk page. Please start a new section, at the bottom, so the editors of the page can properly reply and a dialogue can be started in order to address your edits. Ip208man (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

retrospective mind reading

Hi DaveWF, just read your comment on 'Re: Deborah Jeane Palfrey'. You state your points most concisely and clearly as to why Palfreys comments in the Jones interview should be included, regardless of peoples opinion of Jones. If the above response appeared on Usenet, it could be described as a time shuffle. I.E the poster can retrospectively read Palfrey mind and can reliably predict her actions at a future date. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ip208man#Re:_not_a_high_quality_link emacsuser (talk) 16:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]