User talk:Dave4478

Higgs boson nominated for GA

Hi,

You recently contributed to the Higgs boson article.

Now that the article is stable, relatively consistent, comprehensive, easy to read, and balanced, I wondered what more you think it needs to get to Good Article quality? It would be nice to get it there as it's a "top importance" article in its field, and the Higgs boson is of considerable popular interest.

I've summed up the points I can think of on its talk page and linked a few others to the post. Thorough review, fixes, and comments appreciated, and - shall we go for it :)

GA criteria are here.

FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 09:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eight-thousander

Thanks for your comment on the photo of Lothse, have now fixed it. Britishfinance (talk) 14:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]