User talk:DavAlex

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DavAlex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked by user:husond for sockpuppeting after I reverted some controversial edit by User:corticopia because of not providing sources for some of the data on the Europe page. I have nothing to do with sockpuppeting and I was doing only what I thought was right. I believe that if you are using some sort of data you should provide sources for them, at least thats how it should be if we want to be credible editors. I believe that big and controversial edits should be discussed first , its an elementary ethics. editors should not be banned for some unclear reasons.

Decline reason:

Your contributions closely mimic those made by User:Polscience, both in where they were made and their style. From what I can tell, Husond's conclusion was correct. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.