User talk:Dauerad

Welcome!

Hello, Dauerad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Meno25 01:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Hoc

Thank you for taking care of the Sigma Chi page and making sure everything is up to snuff.

IHSV

75.50.116.227 (talk) 09:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Chi

Dauerad: Welcome! Thank your for your edits on the Sigma Chi page; are you a Sig? We have a userbox that you can copy from my userpage if you are. A list of alumni chapters is a great idea, but it should be a separate page, like the undergraduate chapter list. I look forward to editing with you! —Scouter Sig 14:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. We need to keep the links in the list to the chapters web sites. Making an additional External Links section is going to be wasteful and redundant. With 100,000 plus non-active alumni out there we need all the help we can in promoting our alumni chapters and associations to help get them involved again in the Sigma Chi. In Hoc, Dauerad 16:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about a listing of provinces? The Eastern Province has a web site as well. In Hoc, Dauerad 16:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A list of provinces? That may be "too much;" i.e. not relevant or interesting to enough people to merit a page. Although... we could add Province info to the Active chapter list, possibly. Let's do a strawpoll about that first. And as far as external links go, Wikipedia has a pretty strong policy (see WP:EL) about not being used as a repository of links or for self-promotion. So a link to the sigmachi.org site would be the only EL that would be allowed/useful. And if you have questions, don't hesitate to ask! —Scouter Sig 17:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not too worried about that the links. They're not leading to promotional sites or venue raising sites. Just more detailed information on the subject. Considering how deeply that is burried on the Sigma Chi web site, what we have is far more useful for brothers trying to find info on Sigma Chi in their area. If wikipedia wants to police them, so be it. But as Sigma Chis we need to be loyal to the fraternity and our brothers first, not second to wikipedia. In Hoc, Dauerad 20:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While a province only page would be too small, it wouldn't be very useful either. What I propose is a listing of chapters, both alumni and undergraduate by province. I haven't been able to find that info anywhere via Google other than an outdated web site. Headquarters lists the provinces for the undergrads, but the listing for alumni is not there. If it's not tied to chapters, it's small enough for the main page. In Hoc, Dauerad 12:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scoutersig: Hello. Yes, I am the President of the Washington Alumni Chapter. I created a page using the undergraduate page as a template, but I'm not sure I linked to it correctly in the main page. The page name is: Sigma_chi_alumni_chapters. Dauerad 15:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great start. I moved the page to List of Sigma Chi Alumni Chapters; if you link to it elsewhere, use that name. The new name is more in line with the standard naming sequence. Great idea, and In Hoc —Scouter Sig 15:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's keep in mind that this is supposed to be a source of information, a reference. Nothing that relates to the topic is too much. Let's not digress to form over function. In Hoc, Dauerad 18:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a picture from one of the Benjamin Piatt Runkle Memorials that I host in Washington, DC, in September. Can you add it to the Benjamin Piatt Runkle Page? You can get the image from here: http://www.dcsigmachi.org/images/uploads/Runkle_White_Rose_122803b.jpg. In Hoc, Dauerad 18:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who took this? And do they give permission for it to be used mercilessly? Also, I would assume that it is a group of alumni from the DC chapter? Wikipedia needs this info, or it may be deleted.—Scouter Sig 01:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Praetor Jon Miller took it. I don't know about mercilessly, but to include in Sigma Chi web sites, yes. It's a mix of alumni and undergraduates from Virginia. The brother on the right with the crest on his blazer is George Hooper the warden for the memorial. In Hoc, Dauerad 12:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Brother, here is the picture you requested to be uploaded. Note: it is already listed for possible deletion due to the fact that you only wanted it used for a specific purpose (total free-license should be given for regular Wikipedia pictures). Click on the picture to go to that page to learn more about how picture licensing on Wikipedia works (or doesn't work, sometimes). —Scouter Sig 15:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grilled cheese sandwich

Hey there. I note you seem to be involved in an edit war on Grilled cheese sandwich. Please note that our three revert rule states that users should not make more than three reverts in a content dispute in 24 hours. Repeated reverts are unconstructive - please take discussion to the talk page. I would ask that you please undo your most recent revert that takes you beyond three reverts in the past 24 hours, and cease edit warring in favour of discussion. Thanks. Will (aka Wimt) 15:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dauerad: One was my mistake not knowing how to use the redo feature ... adding comments. But I think we've already come to a satisfactory conclusion having pointed out that I wasn't doing what they were accusing me of without following the link.

Barack Obama

Just a friendly notice. Please be aware that the specifics of Obama's ethnic heritage are already covered in the article, and that the lead contains the description of him that most commonly appears in the news media. --Good Damon 19:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, your recent edit summary contains what may be an accidental choice of words - or perhaps requires some clarification. You wrote in the summary: This is supposed to be facts not opinion. Please understand that Wikipedia is about verifiability, not truth. Although in some pursuits it is perhaps a noble goal to mine for "the truth", it is not what Wikipedia is about. Whether you or I (or anyone) agree with the way information is being presented is not nearly as important as whether or not it can be supported by citations from reliable sources. Frank | talk 20:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"World Children's Choir"

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of "World Children's Choir", and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.worldchildrenschoir.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]