User talk:Dassiebtekreuz

Hello!!! Thanks for your related edits to Russian cinema. A much needed area of improvement and expansion on wikipedia. I am currently attempting to draw up a detailed List of Soviet films which needs a lot of work. Could you help develop it? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^Talk? 19:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich Hertz

Please consider re-visiting Talk:Heinrich Hertz#jewish ancestry. I'd be interested in your feedback about the suggested edit strategy I've proposed. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrei Rublev - is it time?

I noticed that you've done some excellent work on the article and I wanted to ask if you might be interested in bringing it to FAC? If not, are there any additional forms of help or resources that WP:FILMS could provide? Many thanks and keep up the good work! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 00:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

University of Bonn

Hi there, how are you getting along with this? Can you find the sources for the article? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Solaris (1972 film)

Solaris (1972 film) is currently on hold. You can see my comments here. Cheers, Kakofonous (talk) 18:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that the film article achieved Good Article status -- congratulations! Are you planning to continue expanding article to achieve Featured Article status? If you are, can I suggest looking into academic studies for the film? A good place to start is Google Scholar, which has these. I could help you uncover some of these resources if you're interested. Just drop a line on my talk page! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Liberia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Liberia. Interested? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 17:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, thanks, Liberia is only a temporary interest. Dassiebtekreuz 17:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I was going to say aren't you the guy who works on russian articles? Liberia has to be one of the least developed countries on wiki -so anything you can do is a bonus. Regards ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 18:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 5 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bodys Isek Kingelez, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jin Jing

If you have the time can you propose a scaled down version of the Jin Jing article. In its current state with selective quoting from reputable news sources spins a one sided article. My editing skills are lacking and I've seen some of your edits which are pretty concise. Thanks. Oiboy77 (talk) 17:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warmonger

Hi:) I'd like to know why you didn't copy this article to the Wictionary if you thought it belonged there. Don't you think that by just deleting it from Wikipedia you made somebody's work disappear? Thanks for your answer:) Woodchuck (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Davidcass.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Davidcass.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

jin jing

There is no neutrality problem now. I will remove the NPOV tag.--Jingandteller (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jin Jing

Hi, could you have a look at my proposal at Talk:Jin_Jing#Proposal_to_keep_the_article_as_is and weigh in with your opinion? Thanks, Novidmarana (talk) 17:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Psikhelekedana.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Psikhelekedana.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Psikhelekedana-mozambique.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Psikhelekedana-mozambique.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Margins

You seem t have significantly misunderstood the notions of extensive and intensive margins, but I invite you to participate in discussion at Talk:Margin (economics) before I effect change to the article on this score. —SlamDiego_←T 11:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Davidcass.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Davidcass.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sverdlovsk

Don't be confused between Sverdlovsk, Ukraine and Yekaterinburg in Russia. You were wrong in here. Ukrainian Sverdlovsk is located in Donbas coal region. Russian Yekaterinburg is located in Ural mountains. 11:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by His2ryM1n (talk • contribs)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mongolie sovietique.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mongolie sovietique.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Anatoly Solonitsyn in Andrei Rublev.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Anatoly Solonitsyn in Andrei Rublev.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Casting of the bell in Andrei Rublev.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Casting of the bell in Andrei Rublev.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Andrei and Theophanes the Greek.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Andrei and Theophanes the Greek.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:File:Iwona Petry in Szamanka.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:File:Iwona Petry in Szamanka.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 02:09, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Steamroller and the violin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Steamroller and the violin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dassiebtekreuz! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 236 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Nikolai Burlyayev - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Margarita Terekhova in Tarkovsky's The Mirror.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Margarita Terekhova in Tarkovsky's The Mirror.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 13:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The killers Tarkovsky.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The killers Tarkovsky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 22:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Siegel Uni Bonn.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siegel Uni Bonn.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Natalya bondarchuk.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Natalya bondarchuk.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eduard David 1907.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Eduard David 1907.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:41, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:On the silver globe.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:On the silver globe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Psikhelekedana-sculpture-mozambique.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Psikhelekedana-sculpture-mozambique.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Psikhelekedana-sculpture.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Psikhelekedana-sculpture.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eduard David 1907.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Eduard David 1907.jpg appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
Where and how this particular version was obtained.
When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Dassiebtekreuz}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Solaris (1972 film)

Solaris (1972 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 02:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]