User talk:Das capitalist

August 2024

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JJP and INLD aren't major parties. According to Wikipedia policies you can't add them. INLD got only 1 seat last time and 2% vote. JJP recieved only 0.5% vote on LS. Das capitalist (talk) 17:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shiromani Akali Dal, you may be blocked from editing. OnlyNano^talk 16:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SAD isn't radical right-wing Das capitalist (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at 2024 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election. Dhruv edits (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bharatiya Janata Party, Gujarat. FPTI (talk) 05:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Bharatiya Janata Party, Madhya Pradesh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You deleted the entire opening section of this article with no edit description. You need to stop. FPTI (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent edit you made to Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Talk page useful. Before a change, consider using article's talk page or use sandbox for test edits. Thank you. ZDX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 15:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down!

You've been making thousands of characters of edits to different pages in the space of less than five minutes, all from your mobile phone. This is way too fast to be accurate. None of your edits have an edit summary either. Please start by discussing these big edits you are making on the talk page- you are being bold, but to me it just seems like you are deleting whole sections from your phone without even thinking. FPTI (talk) 06:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not deleting. I'm adding. Das capitalist (talk) 06:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, for instance, you deleted at least seven references from the page. Are you just changing every BJP-related infobox to something else? Why? FPTI (talk) 06:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's by mistake Das capitalist (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's why you need to slow down and stop. You just blanked out the entire opening section of this article! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bharatiya_Janata_Party,_Madhya_Pradesh&diff=prev&oldid=1243571222

There is nothing wrong with working slower so you don't make mistakes. When you make so many mistakes, other editors have to clean up after you. Please, just take a break. FPTI (talk) 06:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 12:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Das capitalist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My former account has been blocked because of username controversy. He told me to change my username. But, I unable to change my username. That's why I had to make another account. I had no idea you will block me for that reason. He didn't even replied to my comments.

Decline reason:

This attempt to mislead us will convince nobody. It certainly doesn't convince me. Good block. Yamla (talk) 21:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.