User talk:Darren Lee

Welcome!

Hello, Darren Lee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 19:32, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case

In case you need the services of a Administrator, go to Martial Law or look up Wikipedia:Administrators for a full list of Administrators. I have four (4) listed. Thought I might give you a buzz. You will be in for quite a ride.Martial Law 05:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question

I noticed you've done a lot of editting on pages related to Sarnia and area. You didn't happen to go to St. Christopher High School by chance, did you? You seem to share a lot of the interests of a classmate I had, and I believe he went to UoW after high school. This is probably something that'll be bugging me for a while if I don't ask. 24.36.137.212 18:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since this talk page is publicly viewable, please forgive me if I don't answer you here. If you're serious about getting an answer, please register and an e-mail link should be available. Please use your real name if you contact me this way. An IP address doesn't tell me anything useful about who you are. --Darren Lee 23:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jubal Early and Nathan Fillion

Hey, I reverted your edit where you provided a source for the Jubal Early information on Nathan Fillion. The problem is, this "fact" has been floating around for a while, but as far as I can tell, none of the DVDs actually mention the information. For more information, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firefly#Nathan Jubal Fillion Early. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taekwondo initials

What is it about the initials that you find confusing? All initials are the names of Taekwondo organizations. Sserbin 20:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that tag wasn't the best one to use for this section. Perhaps what I wanted to express was that the acronyms' expansions do not appear anywhere in the article. There's also the problem of whether or not these organizations are notable enough to receive a mention in this article. I'll remove the tag for now but only because I was referring to acronyms, not abbreviations. Darren Lee 22:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see your point. I think in the spirit of the article the question isn't if these organizations are important enough to merit mention, but if their full names are important enough to merit mention. Personally, I prefer the current format which seems to allow any organization to be listed, but only the more important ones are fully named. That being the case, it *is* curious that the American Taekwondo Federation is named, as they are not the IOC approved governing body of taekwondo in the United States. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sserbin (talk • contribs) 2007-03-02T16:34:38

Date autoformatting

Hey, I saw your edit on Jason Chambers and just wanted to let you know that date autoformatting is discouraged now. See WP:MOSNUM. Cheers, --aktsu ^(t / c) 00:05, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. I did not know that autoformatting is no longer desirable. --Darren Lee (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Darren Lee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dave Puzak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Puzak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Puzak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]