User talk:Darranc/Archive 11
This is the Talk page for my 11th year on Wikipedia!
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Darranc. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
|
Archives
|
ITN
 | On 9 October 2015, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tunisian National Dialogue Quartet, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 17:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Note
While I'm sure it is endless laughs, you may want to disable your add-in if you are not going to clean up after it. See [1], and [2]. Kuru (talk) 12:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Really sorry about this. I usually disable the extension when editing. Will try better in future. ~ Ablaze (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Resource Guru for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Resource Guru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resource Guru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)