User talk:Darnotley

May 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Coles Supermarkets. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Bidgee (talk) 13:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Coles Meat.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coles Meat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Bidgee (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Coles Bakery.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coles Bakery.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Bidgee (talk) 14:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Coles External.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coles External.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Bidgee (talk) 14:15, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coles Internal.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coles Internal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for violating the three-revert rule at Coles Supermarkets. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Orderinchaos 07:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orderinchaos 07:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darnotley for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Bidgee (talk) 00:49, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darnotley, and you are therefore blocked indefinitely.
If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 05:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darnotley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unfair action, as I only operate from one computer (one IP address), so it is impossible to use different accounts. Information I updated on the "Coles Supermarkets" page was relevant as the current information is old and outdated (at least 3 years out of date).

Decline reason:

The fact that exactly the same content, word for word, has been added to the article by two different IPs makes your statement difficult to substantiate. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 10:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darnotley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To this very day I still have the same IP address as it is an assigned IP from my provider. There is absolutely no way I am able to 'change' my IP address. As I only reside from ONE location, it is impossible. More than likely, somebody would have reverted the information I created.

Decline reason:

Public Library? Friend's house? Cell phone? Using "I only live in one place" really is not a technically feasible defence as there are thousands of other places to edit from. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.