User talk:Darkside05

Image tagging for Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Darkside05, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Mattinbgn/^talk 09:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calerway

With regard to your article Calerway, please have a read of WP:ATT to see what Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for content are. In general articles need to be referenced by multiple reliable sources independent of the subject and each other. Also, see Wikipedia's guidelines on notability. For the article to be kept, it should meet this guideline. Cheers, Mattinbgn/^talk 09:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It may be easier to contact me on my talk page (click "talk" at the end of my sig). Try looking for mentions of Calaway in the music press, online or print, or evidence of appearance on music playlist such as Rage, TripleJ or JTV. See WP:BAND for more help and see if you can get the article to meet any of the criteria shown. Cheers, Mattinbgn/^talk 12:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another note: You can sign your messages by putting four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each message. Now if you are to look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Australia and see the format that is used in discussions. If you want to keep the article then put keep at the start of your message at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calerway and the reason why you think it should be kept and don't forget to sign it. If you can find evidence it has been played on TripleJ, include that in the article with a source and I would reconsider my nomination. Cheers, Mattinbgn/^talk 12:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to assist you in editing your article of Calerway - I have also put forward my arguements as to why the article does meet the notability criteria - am happy to help out if you have any queries. Dan arndt 03:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help man, some errors with the first lineup as you put put Sherron as the first member as the band, as it was Cam, but he left after to continue wih his band Last Yeras hero, but then returned when LYH broke up. Sherron was just a touring member and did not record any music with the band.

Not a problem - if you need any help on any other articles you decide to do let me know Dan arndt 10:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it Jean Paul or Jaun Paul as I have seen two different variations on different websites? Dan arndt 04:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah it's Jaun for sure. (Darkside05 08:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

On the Valet Records website - it indicates Jean Paul but as you have a greater knowledge of the band I accept that it is Jaun Paul Dan arndt 00:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. E&M 19:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 15:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 15:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use rationale provided Dan arndt 08:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A Letter of Credence.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:CalerwaySingle07.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CalerwaySingle07.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Calerway.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Calerway.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 02:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Calerwaylogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Calerwaylogo.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CalerwaySingle07.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CalerwaySingle07.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:19, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CalerwaySingle07.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:CalerwaySingle07.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Moe ε 02:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calerway videos

See WP:YOUTUBE or more specifically Wikipedia:Copyrights. Nothing that may contain copyrighted material may not be linked to like that. Songs and music videos contain copyrights to the band and to the record label, it doesn't matter who made the upload. — Moe ε 08:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can either prove:

1) That Boomtown Records or Calerway doesn't own a copyright on thier music or music videos

Or 2) See that YouTube (not the user on YouTube, the website itself) got permission to use the videos from the owners of the copyrighted material (which they generally don't)

The links won't be restored. Claiming you know them doesn't quite keep copyright vios away. — Moe ε 10:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Calerway.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Calerway.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Calerwaylogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Calerwaylogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Calerway.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Calerway.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 23:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CalerwayLogo08.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CalerwayLogo08.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Rockfang (talk) 23:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MidnightMercenariesCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MidnightMercenariesCover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MidnightMercenariesCover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MidnightMercenariesCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CalerwayLogo08.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:CalerwayLogo08.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 07:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MyLOL

The article MyLOL has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article did not show that this website was notable (per WP:WEB), and did not provide reliable independent sources {see WP:V) to confirm the site's notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i understand, and there will be more sources, as i'm still in the process of adding information to it. And i do not understand about the noteable, meaning it is not popular enough?

Again, please read WP:WEB re notability of websites. And please don't repost the article unless and until you've added the sources that show notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mylol.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mylol.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 23:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Screen(1).JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Screen(1).JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:35, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WWE vs WWF

When the pay-per-views you are editing were aired, the promotion was still called World Wrestling Federation and thus the articles are styled as such. Also, there never was such a thing as the WWE Light Heavyweight Championship, it goes to a redirect. Please stop changing it. Tony2Times (talk) 13:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We don't see it on the official website because WWE are bound by a law that Wikipedia, as an encylopedia, is not bound to. The mentions of WWF and World Wrestling Federation as an entity are always linked and if users click there, they can see when and why the name change happened. But seeing as at the time it was WWF, that's what we write. If you look on WWE.com under the Royal Rumble history page you'll notice it doesn't list the 2004 winner. Does that mean we should not list Chris Benoit, even though it happened, because of political wrangling and pressure inside the WWE? The same applies for the name change. Tony2Times (talk) 14:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Calerway BloodTour.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Calerway BloodTour.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Mylolnew.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mylolnew.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Perth Entertainment Centre has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 13:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cooked TV

The article Cooked TV has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Cooked.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Cooked.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional links

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Personal finance . It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kuru ^talk 11:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of MyLOL

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is MyLOL. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyLOL (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cooked TV

The article Cooked TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable homemade TV show being presented on community access (not commercial) TV.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 08:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Cooked TV

I have nominated Cooked TV, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooked TV. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 08:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userification of Cooked TV

Hello Darkside05, I have userified the article on Cooked TV as requested. Please see User:Darkside05/Cooked TV. If there's anything else I can do, please give me a shout on my talk page. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Doom-logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Doom-logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Darkside05. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Darkside05. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]