User talk:Darkshark0159

Welcome to my talk page. Please place your queries, comments, and concerns below the horizontal divider.
_{User talk archive for Darkshark0159}

Speedy deletion of Image:Riflesight notch trestle.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:Riflesight notch trestle.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Riflesight notch trestle.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sir Stig (talk) 23:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lego set 1375

Hello Darkshark0159,

My name is David, and I would like to ask you kind help to complete my knowledge. On Brickset.com I read a review with the same username, and I found you here on Wikipedia.
I would like to ask some information about the Lego set 1375 what you own. I am most interested in the inventory/partslist of the set, but if you could send some pictures about its box or instruction.

Thank you so much,

Tavid (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Idlewild 1966map.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Idlewild 1966map.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bar stool image

Hi Darkshark,

This will be among the least substantive questions that you get, but if possible can you please tell me what the name is of the design of the "modern bar stools" that are featured in the image which you inserted in the "Bar Stools" article, or at least where you obtained the photo? Whether you know this or not, that is a very unique and attractive design, about which I have been unable to find any other information or images. Thank you in advance for any help you might offer.134.173.195.201 (talk) 23:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hallpass360.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hallpass360.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cadbury fingers canada.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cadbury fingers canada.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Japanese and Chinese responses to imperialism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Japanese and Chinese responses to imperialism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese and Chinese responses to imperialism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ch (talk) 06:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfC - scope and title for the American Revolutionary War article

I am forwarding this RfC notice to you, along with the ongoing Discussion Summary Chart because you are listed as a British Empire Project member interested in colonial or military history. The RfC and discussion is found at Talk:American Revolutionary War. Please feel free to delete this notice if it does not fit your current interests. - TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 11:23, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American Revolutionary War, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which title best defines the SCOPE for the American Revolutionary War?
discussion summarized by TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 09:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A. "American Revolutionary War”	B. "War of the American Revolution"
continuity - used at this WP article and sister articles for 19 years - scope - British-American insurrection in continental North America - participants British & US Congress with respective allies, auxiliaries & combatants - war aims -- Brit: maintain First British Empire with mercantile system -- US: independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland Banks - fish & cure - results - US independence & republic; Britain the biggest US trade partner & finances US expanding business & Treasury - reliable scholarly reference Britannica for the general reader - prominent adherents - all 15 history Pulitzer winner scholars on the topic	modern update - uses 'vast majority of sources' found in a browser search - scope - British-American insurrection in continental North America, spread to Anglo-Bourbon (Fr.&Sp.) War-across worldwide empires, Fourth Anglo-Dutch War-North Atlantic, Second Mysore War-Indian subcontinent & Ocean - participants British & US Congress, France, Spain, Dutch Republic, Kingdom of Mysore - war aims -- Brit: maintain First British Empire with mercantile system -- US independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland Banks - fish & cure -- Bourbons: Gibraltar, Jamaica, Majorca, expand Gambia trade, expand India trade -- Dutch - free trade with North America & Caribbean -- Mysore wider east-Indian sub-continent sphere of influenced results - Second British Empire, Spanish Majorca, French Gambia, further decline of Dutch Republic - reliable scholarly reference [world military dictionary] for the military specialist - prominent adherents - Michael Clodfelter, more to follow