User talk:Darkjedi10

Sign your message with four tildes (~). It's not that hard.

January 2013

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Evolution, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 22:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was very constructive you are just very very stupid. ĐARKJEDI10 22:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Lugia2453 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:47, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for vandalism on Evolution and User:Lugia2453, in addition to personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

why you block me all my edits are very good I am very good cool editor. ĐARKJEDI10 23:02, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkjedi10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I am awesome ĐARKJEDI10 23:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We've got oodles of awesome. What we don't need is vandals. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Keep this up and you'll be blocked indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

but I make very good edits on articles and am very helpful ĐARKJEDI10 23:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkjedi10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am constructive. ĐARKJEDI10 23:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is no possible scenario where the blanking of a prominent article and subsequent personal attacks on another editor could be considered "constructive". If you are not able to take responsibility for your edits and take this block seriously then I would suggest it be extended to indefinite. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 23:39, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.