User talk:Darkest-Link33

TP page

If you are the one constantly reverting SJ and my edit's as an IP, you need to stop. All we are asking is that you verify that the interview is real.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 19:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not you, then I apologize for thinking it was. Sorry.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:38, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is not considered a reliable source (WP:RS), and furthermore not (generally) allowed on Wikipedia per the external link rules (WP:EL. The rationale your using is, with all due respect, rather absurd; "something is reliable source become that source allows people to post whatever they want?". You may as well go about believing anything you read on Blogger, Digg, or the internet for that matter. Popular opinion does not necessarily define truth. Please read the Wiki-policies I left you, before returning to the TP article. -- ShadowJester07 ►Talk 22:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kariteh (talk) 14:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Kariteh (talk) 15:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. -- ShadowJester07 ►Talk 01:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kariteh (talk) 15:05, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further vandalism

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Ian Cairns (talk) 23:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkest-Link33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im not doing vandalism quite the opposite actully im putting down good information with sources and the person who reported me me to you:Katrieh is vadalising the page

Decline reason:

You are right, you were not just vandalizing, but instead vandalizing and making personal attacks — Tiptoety ^talk 23:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Darkest-Link33 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ShadowJester07 ►Talk 10:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]