User talk:DarkandTwisty29

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear DarkandTwisty29: welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!--Kubigula (talk) 04:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

T. R. Knight

I would make a case that your reverts are fine due the exception for Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons issues.Geni 04:33, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'd forgotten about that clause! DarkandTwisty29 04:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 216.186.208.18 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 13:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

moved from my userpage - 4-22-07

I'm sorry but i don't bash, i don't lie, you told me my sources are not legal ? ok but theses words does exist ! I won't be banned because i tell the true !

"Lutine77 01:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

I believe that the words exist. In fact, I've read the articles from which they came. That's how I know they were taken out of context. You have not presented them in their original context (instead you've used them to imply a libelous affair), or provided acceptable sources for them, or explained how they are relevant or appropriate to the articles in question--all important aspects of editing on Wikipedia. DarkandTwisty29 01:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your edits to Grey's anatomy

If that's your sort of thing, I couldn't interested you in a slightly used one tree hill article? many uncareful owners - in need of a clean-up. --Fredrick day 22:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]