User talk:Dark knight rises pavan kumar

December 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2015 in film has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2015 in film was changed by Dark knight rises pavan kumar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952307 on 2015-12-02T12:12:26+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2 was changed by Dark knight rises pavan kumar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893452 on 2015-12-02T12:31:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Your recent edits [1][2][3][4] at 2015 in film are disruptive. There's no clear reason to include currency conversions into Indian rupees, but even if there were, you're going about it the wrong way. Since Wikipedia is a collaborative project, when you notice that content you've submitted has been reverted, you should open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for inclusion, not resubmit the same problematic content over and over again. This is disruptive. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dark knight rises pavan kumar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dark knight rises pavan kumar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stand by Me Doraemon, you may be blocked from editing. Historiador (talk) 19:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stand by Me Doraemon.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Stand by Me Doraemon was changed by Dark knight rises pavan kumar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904298 on 2015-12-02T20:04:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Help me to what can I edit Dark knight rises pavan kumar (talk) 20:07, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you take a look at WP:CIR. You might want to consider contributing to your native language Wikipedia. -- Chamith (talk) 20:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dark knight rises pavan kumar/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Martian (film), you may be blocked from editing. Historiador (talk) 23:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Prem Ratan Dhan Payo. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [5] Please don't make changes to box office gross values without providing new references that support your change. Note also that if there is a range of opinion (because Indian cinema gross numbers are estimates) please present the range of opinion instead of cherrypicking a number that sounds better to you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Prem Ratan Dhan Payo

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Prem Ratan Dhan Payo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of highest-grossing films

You have made several edits at List of highest-grossing films, all of which have had to be reverted due to i) being incorrect; ii) being unsourced; iii) not being consistent with the established format. By all means feel free to update the article but please do so in a way that is consistent with WP:Verifiability and the formatting of the article. Betty Logan (talk) 21:04, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this edit and this one at 2015 in film would you please enlighten us to where you sourced this data? This is not the first time you have changed box office totals on film articles and I would like to believe you are not deliberately introducing factual errors into articles. From now on please do not alter data without providing a source otherwise we will have to treat such edits as vandalism. Betty Logan (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for changing box office values without providing new references to support your changes, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me

Allow me for editing Dark knight rises pavan kumar (talk) 05:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of S. L. B Films

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on S. L. B Films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WWGB (talk) 06:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of most expensive films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 00:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of S. L. B Films

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on S. L. B Films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for failing to respond to concerns and repeatedly changing box office figures without any explanation.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 00:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Dark knight rises pavan kumar/sandbox

Hello, Dark knight rises pavan kumar. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 08:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]