User talk:Dark.reaper.hx

Speedy deletion of The New Hacker's Dictionary

A tag has been placed on The New Hacker's Dictionary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

direct copy of Jargon File, Wikipedia is not a web publisher (article truncated due to 1,572KB size causing loading issues)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Improbcat (talk) 18:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Henri Hernandez

A tag has been placed on Henri Hernandez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ErickAgain (talk) 19:27, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Saviour of the World has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Willking1979 (talk) 22:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Saviour of the World constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Ipatrol (talk) 22:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Saviour of the World. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Willking1979 (talk) 22:23, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Saviour of the World. Ipatrol (talk) 22:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

31 hour block for vandalism past above warning. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Saviour of the World has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 03:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]