User talk:Daria Lebedieva

Welcome!

Hello, Daria Lebedieva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —Paracel63 (talk) 17:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Älmhult

Welcome to the Älmhult group! I see you have been active in English Wikipedia. Here is the ongoing event in Älmhult today. Hope you will stay an active Wikipedian. You can learn more about the basics of Wikipedia through the "Help" link to the left (on the desktop version of Wikipedia) or by asking people. Me, I'm mostly active on Swedish Wikipedia, but you can ask me questions in English as well here. All the best and good luck! —Paracel63 (talk) 17:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autom

Hej!

Thank you for joining Älmhult Wikipedia Group! May I ask your email?Daria Lebedieva (talk) 13:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Daria Lebedieva[reply]

Amrah bint Abdur Rahman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Amrah bint Abdur Rahman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:33, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Daria Lebedieva, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Sayyida Nafisa have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Daria Lebedieva. You have new messages at Discospinster's talk page.
Message added 18:24, 6 March 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

... discospinster _talk 18:24, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amrah bint Abdur Rahman (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://archive.org/stream/the-muwatta-of-imam-malik/0725-0811%2C_Malik%27s_Muwatta%2C_Hadith%2C_EN_djvu.txt. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Amrah bint Abdur Rahman may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Daria Lebedieva! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sitt al-'Ajam

The article Sitt al-'Ajam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not clear what the subject of this article is, or which individual it is referring to. Content is largely WP:OR and is more of an essay than an article. Even if there is a notable individual by this name, nothing in the article is salvageable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hugsyrup (talk) 10:54, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sitt al-'Ajam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sitt al-'Ajam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sitt al-'Ajam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hugsyrup (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answers to the nomination from the author of the article

1) I was told to remove the article-for-deletion notice in the last message because I have added changes; 2) The woman- I was writing about in this short article- was mentioned at least in the three academic sourses (in English); 3)One of her merits is to write a commentary on 300 hundred pages I think not every contemporary famous writer is able to surpass this record. If the work is titled commentary it does not belittle the importance of its content. 4) The very issue with deletion of the article looks like gender-biased.

A page you started (Fatima bint Mundhir) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Fatima bint Mundhir.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Idealmuslimah appears to be a blog, which are generally considered to be unreliable unless proven otherwise (see WP:BLOGS). Additionally, muslimheritage.com has been dismissed when raised in RSN discussions such as this one.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]