Jump to content

User talk:Darcyisverycute/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medicalisation of sexuality has been accepted

Medicalisation of sexuality, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lewcm Talk to me! 20:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Louisa Lawson House has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Louisa Lawson House. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 17:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Medicalisation of sexuality has been nominated for WP:DYK by me

Template:Did you know nominations/Medicalisation of sexuality During the nomination, I and the reviewer may make edits before it displays on the main page. Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 06:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the nomination. I was considering a DYK nomination myself, but I couldn't think of any good phrases to use. Best wishes Darcyisverycute (talk) 08:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louisa Lawson House has been accepted

Louisa Lawson House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 09:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Louisa Lawson House

Hello, Darcyisverycute,

Thank you for creating Louisa Lawson House.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, Darcyisverycute Nice work!, Thank you for your contribution. Cheers!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dcotos (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I have deorphaned it. Darcyisverycute (talk) 02:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Darcyisverycute. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
  • Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
  • Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Fullerton Cove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullerton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Hucksters.net

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hucksters.net. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Foweirp (talk) 19:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

What source has this quote from Medicalisation of sexuality?

Namely the capability to have pleasant and safer sexual practices that are free of violence, coercion, and discrimination in "Mind-body dualism". If a quote cannot be located, it must be deleted, per WP:Verifiability#Unsourced. Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 04:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

NVM, there was a citation, but it was removed due to being cited by a predatory publisher. I deleted the quote. Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 04:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

The Reviewer Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Darcyisverycute for collecting more than 50 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Just asking

How did you make the rotated letters in your signature? Tedmcbur (talk) 16:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

@Tedmcbur Sorry for replying so late! View source is exactly what this is for-- wait a second, did view source change signature markup display, now in view source I see the signature with markup and have to click on it to display the code... Anyway, the code is <span style="transform:rotate(-5deg);display:inline-block;color:#9400D3">Darcy<span style="transform:rotate(10deg);display:inline-block;color:#0645ad">isvery</span>cute</span>. There's a hard character limit enforced by MediaWiki of 255 characters, but I wanted to fit in as many rotations as possible. I needed to keep display:inline-block otherwise it wouldn't format properly around other comments, so the command ends up being pretty long just for the rotate and colour, and this markup code does count towards the the character limit. The trick I did is one rotation is nested inside the other so that it kind of looks like three rotations but still fits in the character limit. You can find more information about the HTML transform property here, there are a number of sites but I find the mozilla docs most up to date especially on compatibility info. Darcyisverycute (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Medicalisation of sexuality

On 14 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Medicalisation of sexuality, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as a result of the medicalisation of sexuality, sexual disorders like erectile dysfunction have been used as a "penile health gauge" to measure general wellbeing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Medicalisation of sexuality. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Medicalisation of sexuality), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Darcyisverycute,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)