User talk:Darchaf

Nomination for List of Christian Rock Bands

I believe that your article, List of Christian rock bands should be nominated to become a featured article on the wikipedia site. Are you okay with this nomination???Edwied (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What???? Okay???? You think itll go through??? Of course Im okay with the idea!!! Go ahead!!!!!Darchaf (talk) 13:34, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well then. Ill nominate it nowEdwied (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

THANX!!!

Welcome!

Hello, Darchaf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like List of Christian Rock Bands, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Christian Rock Bands

A tag has been placed on List of Christian Rock Bands, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome :)

Hello Darchaf, and welcome to Wikipedia! I can well assume that you've viewed all the recent discussion at "User talk:PMDrive1061", "User talk:WikHead", and "User talk:Mazca", and must say that I'm pleased to see that your article has survived the speedy-deletion process. You certainly seem to be doing a good job with it, and I'm eager to see what your final draft will eventually look like. My only concern (as well the reason I first got involved) deals with disambiguation and WP:OVERLINK issues. This basically means that the body of the article should really only contain one link to any other given article, and that link should tested to assure it targets its intended article (i.e. "Rock (geology)" is something you might throw at a train, "Rock music" is a music genre, and "Rock" is nothing more than an annoying dab-page... etc.). Using the correct link-targets is critical to ease of user-navigation and readability... and if you or I don't adjust these, some other user most certainly will. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia. If there's anything I can help you with, please don't hesitate to drop a message on my talk page. Regards, and happy editing :) -- WikHead (talk) 00:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! Just completed the article, and fixed that problem.

Thanks for your edits

Particularly to List of Christian rock bands, but the first paragraph doesn't explain anything about Christian rock and the second is pure fiction. I deleted both. Again. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revised the paragraphs. Hope you like themDarchaf (talk) 21:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding original and unrelated research to the article. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:56, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yo I`m the creator.The new revision sort of works. But what I revise, plz don`t mark as vandalism. Its editation. Darchaf (talk)

Thanks for creating the page, but I trust that doesn't mean you assert ownership of it. Most lists that I've seen have no lede as they don't need them. The article that makes sense to attempt expand is Christian rock not the list of bands. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just don't mark my changes as vandilism, please! I don't want to get banned because you didn't agree with my changes... But

yeah, i guess the article works now... The thing is, to become a featured list, you need to have a good solid intro. I just hope

that one is enough... Darchaf (talk) 01:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from List of Christian rock bands. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:44, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]