User talk:Darazon

Bruce Johnson talk page

When you redirected the old Talk:Bruce Johnson page to Talk:Bruce Edward Johnson you inadvertently left the Bruce Johnson page without a talk page. Can you undo that? I think the original talk page probably moved with the page automatically. -- Bdoserror 06:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I was able to fix it myself. -- Bdoserror 06:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in HeadCount Corporation

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on HeadCount Corporation, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because HeadCount Corporation is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting HeadCount Corporation, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cadbury Caramilk Bar.jpg

Hi. Could you please add the appropriate licence information to this picture? Otherwise it is almost certain to be deleted, since Wikipedia does not allow the uploading of images without a suitable free licence, other than in certain very specific cases where a free photo could not be obtained. You also need to supply the precise source of the image, since we need to be certain that it came from an acceptable source (ie not simply a Cadbury website, advert, Google etc). Thanks! Loganberry (Talk) 19:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Cadbury Caramilk Bar.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Cadbury Caramilk Bar.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 06:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of People counter

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is People counter. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People counter. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Western University College of Podiatric Medicine

The article Western University College of Podiatric Medicine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP: N. I'm struggling to find suitable secondary coverage about the subject. The current sourcing is either primary, databases, or what seems to be routine coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]