User talk:Darantz11
6teen articles
[edit]I'd figure we should discuss this here instead of within the edit summaries of the pages. Granted TELETOON spells the title with capitals, and I'm sure certain TV guides do as well (there are also those that spell it as 6teen), but as officially templated on the series (the opening credits, DVD covers, etc.), the title is spelt in lower case. The main 6teen article already has the fully capitalized "6TEEN" in its intro, and I don't see anything wrong with it being used to emphasize in the beginning, but outside of that, the other instances should follow what is set out in the series itself. --Benten 16:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Granted. But I've set it up so either way, the wiki link will still go to the same wiki article. Still I do not agree with the lowercase version. And by the way, as per Jen Masterson, the word "boobs" was actually used in the show, not "breasts".Darantz11 16:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- You said: "also, as an encyclopedia article, quoting dialogue should be kept to WikiQuote (which is why slang shouldn't be used". So let's put it in a WikiQuote, then.Darantz11 16:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm aware that either spelling redirects to the main article, but in practice, the title should be written as the series presents it. Also, while the word "boobs" was used in the show itself, it doesn't necessarily mean that it should be duplicated in the article; slang is something to be avoided. Regarding WikiQuote, if you think that it's relevant, you could place the discussion surrounding Jen's flashing on 6teen's WikiQuote article (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/6teen) --Benten 16:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Probably not, you'll all just laugh at me, me, who knows all about this Canadian show, up against Americans whose word goes. Besides, my Wikipedia account doesn't work at WikiQuotes... Anyway, I was also wondering, must 6TEEN be considered a Nickelodeon show since it is no longer on Nickelodeon due to low ratings? Darantz11 16:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not American; I'm Canadian. Anyways, regarding Nickelodeon, are you referring to the fact that the 6teen character articles are w/in the Nickelodeon Characters WikiProject? Because, articles can be under multiple WikiProjects. I assume the only reason that the articles are currently only a part of WikiProject Nickelodeon is because there aren't other specific WikiProjects that they could be categorized under. --Benten 16:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Understood. And I apologize for being rough with you earlier. I sometimes worry about users here who rewrite articles for no other reason other than their own evil ends. Anyway, thanks for being there. Darantz11 16:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- No harm done. --Benten 16:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Understood. And I apologize for being rough with you earlier. I sometimes worry about users here who rewrite articles for no other reason other than their own evil ends. Anyway, thanks for being there. Darantz11 16:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not American; I'm Canadian. Anyways, regarding Nickelodeon, are you referring to the fact that the 6teen character articles are w/in the Nickelodeon Characters WikiProject? Because, articles can be under multiple WikiProjects. I assume the only reason that the articles are currently only a part of WikiProject Nickelodeon is because there aren't other specific WikiProjects that they could be categorized under. --Benten 16:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Probably not, you'll all just laugh at me, me, who knows all about this Canadian show, up against Americans whose word goes. Besides, my Wikipedia account doesn't work at WikiQuotes... Anyway, I was also wondering, must 6TEEN be considered a Nickelodeon show since it is no longer on Nickelodeon due to low ratings? Darantz11 16:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm aware that either spelling redirects to the main article, but in practice, the title should be written as the series presents it. Also, while the word "boobs" was used in the show itself, it doesn't necessarily mean that it should be duplicated in the article; slang is something to be avoided. Regarding WikiQuote, if you think that it's relevant, you could place the discussion surrounding Jen's flashing on 6teen's WikiQuote article (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/6teen) --Benten 16:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Regarding your recent edits to the 6teen article, fansites are not legitimate external links to be added to pages. (For further information, see: Wikipedia:External links and WK:NOT). --Benten 14:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Just wondering: Is there any place on Wikipedia where they would be allowed or where exception(s) might be done for them? --Darantz11 22:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Darantz11. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for creating this. Could you please add references? The WP:BURDEN is on the creator to do so. Thanks again, Boleyn (talk) 12:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Darantz11. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Darantz11. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Darantz11. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)