User talk:Daps166

This is Daps166's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Wilkins (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Wilkins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 05:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Daps166, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 05:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can this be deleted please as I’d rather it not be public.

Many thanks Daps166 (talk) 12:57, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hi, Daps166. Please don't remove well-sourced relevant content from articles, as you did at For Britain. Your argument that the importance ("minor") or the ideology of a political party is "irrelevant" is very strange. Bishonen | talk 16:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Notfrompedro. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 12:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting abuse allegations from a source that is the victim.

Stop deleting information that is factual

Daps166 (talk) 12:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits used deprecated sources. They are not reliable sources and therefore cannot be used. Please read WP:BLP as biographies of living persons are held to high standards. Notfrompedro (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What about the Instagram post of the victim that corroborates everything

Daps166 (talk) 12:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UGC. Please take a moment to read the links I have provided. Notfrompedro (talk) 12:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop supporting abuse. I’ve edited the controversy section to just include the VICTIMS statement and a link to it.

DONT DELETE IT or you’re complicit in abuse Daps166 (talk) 12:57, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Brown (chef), you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop distributive deleting of evidence of DONESTIC VIOLENCE YOU SCUM CUNT Daps166 (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive**

You are deleting allegations of abuse. Stop covering for abusers Daps166 (talk) 13:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Tom Brown (chef). Notfrompedro (talk) 13:19, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will re edit it without the “defamation” then.

Well done on covering for abusers you absolute idiot Daps166 (talk) 13:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You will be getting sued if you keep blocking this information Daps166 (talk) 13:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have turned your talk page access off, as you are continuing to use abusive language.

I will also say this : Do NOT EVER accuse someone of domestic / sexual assault without solid evidence that it is important to be logged in a global encyclopedia, such as a full-length piece in the New York Times. See the policy for biographies of living persons involving criminal activity and Donald Trump sexual assault allegations as a sample of a compliant article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]