Jump to content

User talk:Danzo121

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Danzo121, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gary King (talk) 08:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Todd Bentley appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. NeilN talkcontribs 00:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. EBY3221 (talk) 01:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danzo121, I've just checked and the last 10 edits you made to Todd Bentley AND Lakeland revival carried a clearly non-neutral point of view, and your edits all were reverted to correct the problems.EBY3221 (talk) 01:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EBY3221 (talk) 01:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent edit by this user was made at 22:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC). The first advisory above from NeilN was made at 01:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC). Is there some reason or purpose to your multiple warnings when there has been no further user activity since the first user advisory? Mike Doughney (talk) 03:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]