User talk:Dannymilliren

Hi!seen us? click the link. Entrepreneur remember.Dannymilliren (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tolozar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tolozar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ballon festival

A tag has been placed on File:Ballon festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Mushroom releasing a spore.png

Thanks for uploading File:Mushroom releasing a spore.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Artists trace of the aminita.png

Thanks for uploading File:Artists trace of the aminita.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

chart

my chart

species	desc	extinct period	sign	acceptive
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example	Example	Example

1. REDIRECT tawa(dinosaur)

Dannymilliren (talk) 21:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Falafel!

eat it!!!!!!!!!!!! Dannymilliren (talk) 22:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

science project home 1: what's this tricholoma?

I saw a trich on my porch while my mom told jack to wash his hands.I went to look, then something strange was about it; it was a tricholoma! Link is on the page HERE! science at home 1: what's the trich

science project home 1: what's this tricholoma?

I saw a trich on my porch while my mom told jack to wash his hands.I went to look, then something strange was about it; it was a tricholoma! Link is on the page HERE! science at home 1: what's the trich

science project home 1: what's this tricholoma?

I saw a trich on my porch while my mom told jack to wash his hands.I went to look, then something strange was about it; it was a tricholoma! Link is on the page HERE! science at home 1: what's the trich

science project home 1: what's this tricholoma?

I saw a trich on my porch while my mom told jack to wash his hands.I went to look, then something strange was about it; it was a tricholoma! Link is on the page HERE! science at home 1: what's the trich

science project home 1: what's this tricholoma?

I saw a trich on my porch while my mom told jack to wash his hands.I went to look, then something strange was about it; it was a tricholoma! Link is on the page HERE! science at home 1: what's the trich

science project home 1: what's this tricholoma?

I saw a trich on my porch while my mom told jack to wash his hands.I went to look, then something strange was about it; it was a tricholoma! Link is on the page HERE! science at home 1: what's the trich

science project home 1: what's this tricholoma?

I saw a trich on my porch while my mom told jack to wash his hands.I went to look, then something strange was about it; it was a tricholoma! Link is on the page HERE! science at home 1: what's the trich

science project home 1: what's this tricholoma?

I saw a trich on my porch while my mom told jack to wash his hands.I went to look, then something strange was about it; it was a tricholoma! Link is on the page HERE! science at home 1: what's the trich

science project home 1: what's this tricholoma?

I saw a trich on my porch while my mom told jack to wash his hands.I went to look, then something strange was about it; it was a tricholoma! Link is on the page HERE! science at home 1: what's the trich

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Science at home 1: what's the trich.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  :- ) Don 02:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Science at home 1: what's the trich

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Science at home 1: what's the trich, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PKT(alk) 14:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Don't lie! It was meaningful content!Dannymilliren (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)--

I saw you lie,PKT. At least make use to stop Young zaphod's hidden socks that are causing personal attacks.Young Zaphod--Dannymilliren (talk) 21:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 02:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing yourself to my attention: whatever you're trying to do with Wikipedia, it isn't working, and I've blocked you on competence and disruption grounds, not to mention probable sockpuppetry. Acroterion (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dannymilliren (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well, there's no nonsense on any of my pages,and I do not cause sockpuppetry, you're possibly mistaken a sock from somebody else
for a non-existent sock from me, also, I follow all of the rules of wikipedia, and the guidelines of wikipedia. All you have to do is
revert the deletion of my user page, it isn't nonsense. You are mistaken about the blocking, and I was trying to become a admin. Dannymilliren (talk) 02:32, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You clearly do not understand the purpose of this project. It is an encyclopedia, not a forum for you to understake projects, and doing so is disruptive. As to your expressed intention to be an admin, you have a long way to go. You have, in 18 months here, made 52 edits. most admins who are created now have at least 6,000 contributions to their credit, including a good number of sensible edits in admin-related areas. When you are approaching this level of competence then you might think of applying. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you think are the socks of me? NIGHT NIGHT

My comments above stand, and the primary reason for blocking was disruption and general nonsense. Acroterion (talk) 02:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

What you don't get, Danny, is that Wikipedia is not a place to post science projects for people. You have kept on doing so even after people told you that you can't. Since the "Science at home" pages were in direct contravention of WP:NOT, you have broken some rules. Also, you say you want to become an admin; first thing you need to know is that admins generally don't get promoted in their first month. Since I've seen some competence issues from you, I have a feeling you view Wikipedia as a game where becoming an admin is winning. It's not. I don't know anything about the sock issue, so no comment on that. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 03:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dannymilliren (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm only a kid, but you should unblock me if possible. Dannymilliren (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

for reasons already stated. And I have already told you the usual minimum requirements for admin responsibility. Further unblock requests on the same lines will lead to your being denied access to this page. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 23:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's an obvious association or obsession with the long-blocked blocked sockmaster Young Zaphod (talk · contribs) account. Since most of the socks associated with that account were active in 2006-2008, this account's activities look strange. The net effect is disruptive. Acroterion (talk) 03:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Hmm... The sockmaster young zaphod has made a giant aftermath. If you get my userpage back and unblock me, turn me into a admin.--Dannymilliren (talk) 21:58, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


As you didn't know, wikipedia isn't a game. You supposededly ARE going haywire. Until you calm down and know what that WP:NOT means.
My mom is going to unblock me. You need to listen to mom's letter.

Danny, I am certain that your mom is not an admin here, since you need an admin to unblock. If she was, she'd also block you for what you're doing. Also, down below you want to become an admin, but we are in absolutely no position to trust you right now since you've created inappropriate pages repeatedly even when we warned you, and you also are a very inexperienced user. In short, any request for adminship you will make for now is going to be declined. Keep that in mind.

Also, when requesting unblock, you should directly address the block reason, which you haven't done so far. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 03:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

I am not inappropiate, that is child abuse when you say that.Dannymilliren (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

I know wikipedia isn't a game

To start off,I know wikipedia isn't a game, but obviously, wikipedia needs another admin(me). Acroterian, can you please unblock me and get my userspace pages back and turn
me into a administrator? It isn't winning, but then the aftermath that is not cleaned up can be cleaned by me. It's obvious.Dannymilliren (talk) 22:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

You obviously have no clue as to how wikipedia works. Please go away until you are older. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 23:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Userboxes

USER

I have no idea what this means. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 03:52, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

NOW I'm talking SERIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hmph.

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Ranting about stuff will make your situation even worse. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Danny is my 8 year old autistic son. Please act accordingly. He is hyperlexic and on a college reading level but only eight years old with autism. -- his mom. sorry for the confusion. please make remarks appropriate for an eight year old.

Understood, thanks for letting us know. Ordinarily we discourage children of that age from editing Wikipedia, for lots of fairly obvious reasons.His skills are impressive for age eight, and we look forward to his participation when he's more mature and able to contribute. We have a lot of editors on the autism spectrum, and Wikipedia wouldn't be where it is now without them. I will probably remove editing access to this page for him for his own protection and to reduce disruption for those keeping an eye on things. He will be welcome back when he is interested and able to contribute productively. Acroterion (talk) 12:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

thank you Acroterion. He loves Wikipedia, is there some forum where he can write and ask questions without editing? I am not very familiar with the different pages Wikipedia has. THX for understanding.

Probably not on Wikipedia: editors are asked to focus on encyclopedia improvement. There is the reference desk, but I don't think that he's really ready to participate there. In my experience children younger than, say 12 really aren't able to absorb written conversations in the way that they might understand a spoken discussion, no matter how well they write, and despite his verbal skills, your son reacts pretty much exactly as one would expect an eight-year-old to react to written discussion - a little helter-skelter. Comprehension skills and the ability to take direction from written text just don't develop until later. However, Wikipedia is a supportive environment for folks on the autism spectrum, and I know several editors who self-identify that way, so in a few years he could prosper here. Acroterion (talk) 00:01, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Additionally, I've never been comfortable with the notion of children younger than 12 as active participants on WP: while this is a pretty safe environment, with everything out in the open and closely watched by a large community, kids that young aren't able to detect trouble or to appropriately limit self-revelation. Acroterion (talk) 04:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

So do you think we should lock access to the talk page and wait for a while? I'd advise his mom to keep an eye out, and when he's ready, we can unlock his talk and let him request unblock sometime in the future. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 05:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

No need at the moment: he's blocked, no disruption is taking place and we're communicating with his mother. Acroterion (talk) 14:03, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Well, I can detect trouble well.Dannymilliren (talk) 20:40, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

MORE insisting

My senses for detecting trouble on wikipedia is way better than yours, Acroterion. Regards,Dannymilliren (talk)

I don't need to get declined repeatedly.--Dannymilliren (talk) 20:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Problematic stuff

I developed these skills at the start. Do you promise to unblock me?Dannymilliren (talk)

Talkpage access removed

I've removed your access to this talkpage, since as I've explained above, eight years old is too young to contribute productively to the encyclopedia. We appreciate your fascination with the project, and in four or five years you might be able to help out. Until then, keep reading and learning. Acroterion (talk) 21:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)