User talk:Dannybu2001

I've deleted all my talk, therefore all comments are gone forever. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! History button?! Oh, poo...

Userboxes

Danny, I think you need to move one of the first three userboxes you have to a new line because your side boxes are overlapping.--Sir hugo 17:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have soo many userbox groups I didnt notice when I first left this message. I can only see one group of them not all of them because they over lap. I would play around with formatting of them and try to get them to not overlap somehow, or maybe take them out of the large groups and just place them into headings.--Sir hugo 18:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am using IE and the default skin. Oh well, as long as you can see them that is the most important thing. I just wasnt sure if you had noticed it yet.--Sir hugo 18:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Wii Response

Don't worry about the Wii talk page, I just used page-move archiving. The side effect is that it takes a minute or two to restore the main Talk page from being a redirect. If the Wii article wasn't so active, nobody would've even noticed the redirect. ;) --Stratadrake 16:38, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Narnia

Hello, I noticed that you edited an article related to, or expressed interest in The Chronicles of Narnia. I thought you may be interested in knowing that there is a WikiProject working to improve articles about Narnia, your help would be greatly appreciated. Please consider joining the WikiProject Narnia. Thank you! Bornagain4 00:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Wizard (magazine)

Your recent edit to Wizard (magazine) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jetsons the movie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jetsons the movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 01:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NEW CATEGORY PAGE

Hello Washington-user!! What do you think of this category?
Either on a scale of 1-10 or with commentary.
Let me know through the "Special:EmailUser/" section. #TTiT# 10:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-Traveller-in-Tacoma (talk • contribs)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]