User talk:Danny Sprinkle

Welcome!

Hello, Danny Sprinkle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! FurrySings (talk) 01:12, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Categories

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, please be careful about adding categories in biographies. Wikipedia policy is very conservative about adding categories, and a category is supposed to be added only if there is indisputable evidence that it is correct and that it is relevant to the notability of the person. See WP:BLP and WP:Categorization of people for our policy about biographies and categorization, and especially WP:BLPCAT for the categorization of living peoples. Thanks, FurrySings (talk) 01:17, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings

Aye Danny. Thanks for showing an interest on the Jefferson page. As you can see the page has its issues. btw, I took the liberty of placing the Signator award on your user page. Now you're on the map. Welcome aboard! -- Gwillhickers (talk) 00:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For tinkering up Thomas Patch - looks much better Victuallers (talk) 14:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	This is a thank you for making a very good edit to Climate change. It was the first meaningful edit it many months and added important information that I am amazed wasn't already included. SmartSE (talk) 23:51, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Help with the Holistic Management draft

Hi, Danny. I saw you encouraging Redddbaron to go forward with his Holistic _management draft. He's a new editor and could use some help complying with en.Wikipedia's rules and standards. You seem to have a knack for writing without injecting original research. It would be great if you would collaborate with him on the draft. I added a few comments to his talk page. I hope you'll give him a hand. Take care, DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·cont) Join WER 16:51, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Holistic management

Thanks for the star. Not sure what it means exactly, but hey a star is a star! ;-)

I have been working hard on the holistic management article. Fine tuning it and adding multiple references, both in links to other wiki pages and external links. Whenever I have a reference that may seem weak and/or weaker, I have tried to add multiple references showing multiple POV. I have tried to reference it from mainstream press, trade journals, scientific journals, Government press releases, industry, NGO's, International and local Awards, historical, cultural, political, educational and any other context I could think of while still maintaining a logical coherent flow and not cluttering it up too much. Luckily the weather here is bad, so I have had some spare time to work on this. I actually could write a lot more on it, but the juggling act is to avoid turning it into a fluff piece. With Savory doing power point presentations, Joel Salatin doing power point presentations, Michael Pollan doing power point presentations, even Prince Charles!, a number of books like "The Carbon Fields: How Our Countryside Can Save Britain" all with glowing reviews, I had to put a stop to it somewhere, otherwise it would take on a "to good to be true" tone. In my opinion it is far better than the average wiki pages I ever used (and I use wiki a LOT) but I fully admit since I wrote it, that opinion is obviously biased! hahaha I request you take a careful look and see if it meets wiki standards. If you think it does, please recommend it for publishing in wiki. If it doesn't, please message me with improvements you think it still may need.Redddbaron (talk) 15:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your article looks perfectly acceptable to me. I wasn't at all familiar with the page that was deleted and can't compare to it (unless it's archived somewhere). Very well written and organized. I think any residual objections others may have can be addressed post-reinstatement. Not sure what the formal process for reinstatement is but you certainly have my blessing. Danny Sprinkle (talk) 17:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much. I put it on the list for reinstatement and I asked a question at the teahouse to get advise and consensus. I hope you are right and it is ready, but I think I need more opinions to be sure. Maybe you should post your opinion on the talk page of the new userfied rewrite?Redddbaron (talk) 21:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Wow. Looks like you have succeeded in your latest mission, Redddbaron. Congratulations! And let me know if you still need me to do anything. Danny Sprinkle (talk) 16:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I could use some advise about HMI too. I am not good at organizations. The work they do? That is interesting to me. The corporation behind that work? Even if it is a NGO? Not so interesting to me.Redddbaron (talk) 03:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Could you go to the Holistic management talk page please?Redddbaron (talk) 02:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Edit summaries

You may want to stop using edit summaries for sloganeering. — goethean 21:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll try to keep such outbursts to a minimum. Danny Sprinkle (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barrett Brown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drug user, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert Hoffman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evolutionary anachronism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pawpaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al Goldstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Midnight Blue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Barrett Brown

Hello. I've noticed that you've made some unusual contributions to Barrett Brown, including adding considerable amounts of detailed, unsourced content, an usual style of prose not normally associated with encyclopedia, and some promotional language about Brown's second book. Would you mind explaining your edits there? Thanks. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 11:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Discrimination (to be added after "Sexual Orientation")

Drug Preference

See also: Recreational drug, Drug user, and Responsible drug use

Drug preference discrimination is the unequal treatment of people according to what drugs they use. Drug preference discrimination can facilitate and exacerbate other types of discrimination by exploiting drug preferences of racial, ethnic, religious, and political minorities.

In most societies, people who by custom or preference use or have used illicit drugs face discrimination in voting, employment, housing, and child custody in addition to imprisonment and in some cases torture and execution. Discrimination due to illicit drug use was the most commonly reported type of discrimination among Blacks and Latinos in a 2003 study of minority drug users in New York City, double to triple that due to race.

Ideas of self-ownership and cognitive liberty affirm rights to use drugs, whether for medicine or recreation. Those espousing such ideas cite the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the European Convention on Human Rights as protecting personal drug choices. They are inspired by and see themselves following in the tradition of those who have struggled against other forms of discrimination in the past.

Drug policy reform organizations such the Drug Policy Alliance, the Drug Equality Alliance, the Transform Drug Policy Foundation, and the Beckley Foundation have highlighted the issue of stigma and discrimination in drug policy. The Partnership for Drug-Free Kids also recognizes this issue and shares on its website stories that "break through the stigma and discrimination that people with drug or drinking problems often face."

A report issued by the Global Commission on Drug Policy, critical of the global war on drugs, states, under "Undermining Human Rights, Fostering Discrimination":

Punitive approaches to drug policy are severely undermining human rights in every region of the world. They lead to the erosion of civil liberties and fair trial standards, the stigmatization of individuals and groups – particularly women, young people, and ethnic minorities – and the imposition of abusive and inhumane punishments.

References

Remember that when adding medical content please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Danny Sprinkle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Danny Sprinkle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alerts, please read

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)