User talk:Dankyhashpants

Genres

Regarding your recent edits to the "genre" field of various infoboxes of numerous articles, please keep in mind that the genres mentioned in the infobox should usually reflect the article prose itself. There has also been discussion in Talk:Daft Punk regarding edit wars of genres. Feel free to comment in the talk page or contact me if you have any concerns. jhsounds (talk) 01:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Read. I've left a message on your talk page about this.

dankyhashpants (talk) 01:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the edit history for the Human After All page, you'll notice that your additions to that article were removed by someone else. As for Daft Punk, that article is particularly prone to various genre additions. The point of the genre field should be to describe the artist's work in general, rather than listing every genre the artist has ever attempted. jhsounds (talk) 01:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Human After All

Yes, hi. I explained myself further here. The only genre currently cited in the article is the review by Blender magazine's Simon Reynolds, who calls the album's music "an archly ironic dance-rock..." For all genre changes/additions, please cite a source, preferably a professional critique since genres are subjective interpretations (WP:SUBJECTIVE). Dan56 (talk) 02:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Prime Time of Your Life

Regarding your edits to the article, I explained my removal of the song description of The Prime Time of Your Life in the edit history: your conclusion of what the ending is supposed to represent is WP:OR. jhsounds (talk) 02:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Human After All, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Since when was there a lack of consensus on whether or not house should be considered one of the album's genres? Also, I don't know if you read the entire page, but not only was the inclusion of house as a genre not my idea(therefore it could have never been included to fit my "point of view", though admittedly the inclusion of noise rock was) due to the fact that it was already there, but it was reflected in the (previously cited) prose.

The definition for "associated acts" in the infobox for musical artists requires more than a single performance together. If you think that all the artists you added to Lady Gaga qualify, please explain at the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 21:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lorde. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Adabow (talk) 00:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just cited it. - Dankyhashpants

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tyler, The Creator, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 01:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- that stuff in the Tyler, The Creator page is actually true. it was in a video I watched a few months ago, but I can no longer find it, so I can't source it anymore.

WHY ARE YOU YELLING AT ME

UPdaTE: I Cited It™

July 2014

Please refrain from making controversial changes that have already been discussed on the article's talk page, as you did at Lorde, without first establishing consensus on the talk page. Your edits appear to have gone against established consensus and have been reverted. Thank you. Adabow (talk) 02:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lil B. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 06:46, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Why are you being so unbased? He clearly played keyboard on the albums Rain In England and Choices and Flowers, and he used a sampler on the song New Orleans Based. Dankyhashpants (talk) 06:56, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making controversial changes that have already been discussed on the article's talk page, as you did at Lorde, without first establishing consensus on the talk page. Your edits appear to have gone against established consensus and have been reverted. Thank you. Dwpaul ^Talk 03:49, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. You removed content from Wikipedia with this edit of yours to Amy's Baking Company, but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 16:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- If you noticed, the content I removed was redundant. Dankyhashpants (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. Kokoro20 (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- lol are you serious? My editing was not disruptive, but simply informational. Did you even listen to the album? Dankyhashpants (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Cosby. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Human After All. Dan56 (talk) 20:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

•• Lol, did you listen to the album? Did you read the articles on the singles? It's painfully obvious that Human After All is a noise rock album. Dankyhashpants (talk) 20:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion. Please cite a reliable source to support your change to the article, such as a professional critique or review of the album (WP:SUBJECTIVE). Dan56 (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Bill Cosby. Bbb23 (talk) 20:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

requesting unblock

{unblock|1=I understand that I should cite sources. Please unblock me. I promise I'll be a good boy.}} Dankyhashpants (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Try again. Sources have nothing to do with why you were blocked. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your second unblock request was totally inappropriate. As such, I've blocked you indefinitely and removed your talk page access. You can use WP:UTRS to appeal if you wish. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]