User talk:Danish d parab

January 2016

Hello, I'm Caballero1967. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Drishyam (2015 film) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 18:16, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arjun Kapoor. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Arjun Kapoor was changed by Danish d parab (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93336 on 2016-01-12T11:53:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Arjun Kapoor, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] Additionally, content should be formatted properly. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources

Re: this change, bollymoviereviewz.com is not a sufficient source of data. Anyone can start a website and print whatever information they want, but Wikipedia only cares what mainstream reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. This typically means we don't care about blogs or other random, fly-by-night websites. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for a general list of the sort of sites that are and are not considered reliable. Also note that because Indian film financials are all estimates, and because all of these estimates are subject to manipulation and promotional inflation, they should always be treated with scrutiny. The mere existence of a higher figure does not mean that data is more correct. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]