User talk:Danimora22

References

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Standards

Hello, Danimora22. You have new messages at Jmh649's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You seem to have drawn fire from a self-appointed standards enforcement body that I do not recognize. You might be able to defend your editions with links to descriptions of the journals in question on wikipedia, links to editorials describing a peer review process, or links to changes of that process.

75.152.125.166 (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Version Accepted

I undid a reversion of your work, here, with a citation style more convenient for people to use, because I like that you lead from one place to another, and that your sources are old. Some people on wikipedia are enforcing a guideline against policy, so I want to encourage you with an essay that tells me you can say anything you want on wikipedia if your sources are trustworthy. Content on wikipedia should be dynamic, because consensus about which sources and methods of proof are trustworthy is seldom unanimous. My standards of evidence are very open, until I see bad clues. Bohgosity BumaskiL 75.156.177.148 (talk) 12:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you rewrite the whole article in a wet style?

It's easy to cut material down to a dry style. Unfortunately, I am not sure that the procedure is always helpful. What good iz it if people do not believe it? 75.156.178.30 (talk) 11:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]